Page 226 - DCOM204_AUDITING_THEORY
P. 226

Auditing Theory



                      Notes         reasonable care to ascertain that accounts books show the true position. The auditor is not a
                                    insurer and does not guarantee that the books show the company’s position directly. This point
                                    was further reiterated in Trisure India v. A. F. Fergueson & Co. where it was held that the auditor
                                    must be honest and should have reasonable skill and care in ascertaining the accuracy of the
                                    company’s books of account, balance sheet and profit and loss account. Reasonable care and skill
                                    is not exercised when in spite of the presence of unusual features in the accounts which prima
                                    facie, give reason for believing that the accounts of the company are not in order, the examination
                                    is not detailed.

                                    11.5.8 Standard of Care

                                    Neither legislation nor the normal contract of engagement indicates the standard of care required
                                    of the auditor. However, this issue has been subject to detailed consideration by the Courts. It
                                    has been the law that the auditor must exercise reasonable skill and care in the discharge of his
                                    duties. This has been best described in the following words of Romer J. in City Equitable Fire
                                    Ins. Co., Re : He must be honest, that is, he must not certify what he does not believe to true and
                                    he must take reasonable care and skill before he believes that what he certifies is true. What is
                                    reasonable care in any particular case must depend upon the circumstances of that case. Where
                                    there is nothing to excite suspicion very little inquiry will be reasonably sufficient. Where
                                    suspicion is aroused more care is obviously necessary; but, still an auditor is not bound to
                                    exercise more than reasonable care and skill even in case of suspicion and he is perfectly justified
                                    in acting on the opinion of an expert where special knowledge is required.
                                    The early cases suggested a standard of care based on the concept of the auditor as a watchdog.
                                    In Re Kingston Cotton Mills Case , the Court while holding the auditors liable for not personally
                                    inspecting the securities, it was opined that while it may be easy to charge the auditors with
                                    negligence after the event, the auditor did not have advantage of hindsight. More recent
                                    authorities, however, have higher standard of care based on the auditor’s applying an ‘inquiring
                                    mind’ to his task. In Fomento Sterling Area Limited Selsdson Fountain Pen Co., Lord Denning
                                    observed that “to perform his tasks properly, he (the auditor) must come to it with an inquiring mind —
                                    not suspicious of dishonesty, but suspecting that somebody may have made a mistake somewhere, and a
                                    check must be made to ensure that there has been none”. This point was further reiterated in Re
                                    Thomas Gerrad & Sons Ltd. , where the auditors failed to detect fraudulent accounting principles
                                    although they discovered altered invoices.
                                    They were held liable as “suspicion ought to automatically have been aroused by the discovery”.
                                    Commonwealth cases have also emphasised that the auditor can no longer limit their
                                    investigation to a “watch-dog-role” and a more active inquiring role is required. Thus, it is the
                                    duty of an auditor to bring to bear on the work he has to perform that skill, care and caution
                                    which a reasonable competent, careful and cautious auditor would use. The particular
                                    circumstances of each case determine whether reasonable skill, care, and caution have been
                                    exercised. The trend of the Courts seems to be in the direction of enforcing liability on the
                                    auditors if they fail to take a degree of care which would be required to ensure that there is no
                                    fraud or irregularity. Once the suspicion is raised they must investigate thoroughly and ensure
                                    that any discrepancy in the accounts is brought to light.


                                    11.6 Auditor’s Report

                                    One of the most important duties of the auditor is with regard to the report on the accounts of the
                                    company which the auditor has to submit to the members of the company. “The scheme of the
                                    Act....is that the directors must prepare the accounts; the auditor must make a report to the
                                    members on the accounts; and this report must contain statements on certain specified matters.”




            220                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231