Page 100 - DCOM207_LABOUR_LAWS
P. 100

Unit 6: Payment of Wages Act, 1936




                         or which is not payable under any award or settlement between the parties or   Notes
                         order of a Court;
                     z  the value of any house accommodation, or of the supply of light, water, medical
                         attendance or other amenity or of any service excluded from the computation
                         of wages by a general or special order of the state Government;
                     z  any contribution paid by the employer to any pension or provident fund, and
                         the interest which may have accrued thereon;

                     z  any travelling allowance or the value of any travelling concession;
                     z  any sum paid to the employed person to defray special expenses entailed on
                         him by the nature of his employment; or

                     z  any gratuity payable on the determination of employment in cases other  than
                         those specified in sub-clause (d).

             


              Caselet   Bank of India v. T.S. Kelawala and Ors
               n the case of Bank of India v. T.S. Kelawala and Ors., the question which came for
               consideration was that whether an employer has a right to deduct wages unilaterally
             Iand without holding an enquiry for the period the employees go on strike or resort to
             go-slow. The appellant in this case is a nationalized bank. The demands for wage-revision
             made by the employees of all the banks were pending at the relevant time, and in support
             of the said demands the All India Bank Employees’ Association had given a call for a
             countrywide strike.
             The appellant-Bank issued a circular to all its managers and agents to deduct wages of the
             employees who would participate in the strike for the days they go on strike. The Bank
             issued an Administrative Circular warning the employee that they would be committing
             a breach of their contract of service if they participated in the strike and that they would
             not be entitled to draw the salary for the full day if they did so, and consequently, they
             need not report for work for the rest of the working hours on that day. The court held that,
             Section 7 (2) read with Section 9 of the Payment of Wages Act provides the circumstances
             under which and the extent to which deduction can be made. It is only when the employer
             has  right  to make deduction, resort should be had to  the act  to ascertain  the extent  to
             which the deduction can be made. No deduction exceeding the limit provided by the act
             is permissible even if the contract so provides. There cannot be contract contrary to or in
             terms wider than the input of sections 7 and 9 of the act. Therefore wage deduction cannot
             be made under section 7(2) of the Payment of Wages Act if there is no such power to the
             employer under the terms of contract.

          Source: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1593043
          Self Assessment


          State whether the following statements are true or false:
          1.   The State Government is responsible for enforcement of the Act in railways and air transport
               services, while the Central Governments are responsible for it in factories.
          2.   Prior to 1936, there was no law regarding the regulation of payment to workmen.








                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    95
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105