Page 171 - DCOM208_BANKING_THEORY_AND_PRACTICE
P. 171

Banking Theory and Practice




                    Notes          Self Assessment

                                   Fill in the blanks:
                                   8.  Difference between a promissory note and a bill of exchange is that a bill of exchange is
                                       .........................
                                   9.  A bill not signed by the drawer is called as a/an ......................... bill.
                                   10.  The amount to be paid must be expressed in terms of ..........................

                                   10.3 Promissory Note


                                   A promissory note is a term used for a legal document that declares the intention of an individual
                                   or an entity to pay an amount on demand or at a specified time. A promissory note can be
                                   written on the face value of a debt or for an amount that would include accumulated interest.
                                   A promissory note is simply a “promise to pay.” It contains a maker, i.e. the payer and a lender,
                                   i.e. the payee. An unsecured promissory note is not attached to anything; the loan is made on the
                                   basis of the maker’s ability to repay. A secured promissory note may also be made based on the
                                   maker’s ability to repay, but it is secured by a thing of economic value such as a car or a house.



                                     Caselet     Damodar. S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal-SC of India:

                                                 Impact of Section 147 of Negotiable Instruments Act

                                           his case decided by Supreme Court on Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments
                                           Act speaks upon a new scheme to be adopted by the courts while dealing with
                                     Tcheque bounce cases. As there are reportedly more than 38 lakhs of cheque cases
                                     pending in different courts in India, this decision has laid down a simple working formula
                                     which could be said as one safe step towards preserving the object of Section 138 and
                                     Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments.
                                     Object of Section 138 explained: The decision reiterates the statutory principle and object
                                     as a result of which the Section has come into force. The section has been inserted into the
                                     Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred as ‘Act’) by the Banking, Public Financial
                                     Institutions and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 with an object to
                                     underline the faith in the banking operations and credibility in transactions using
                                     negotiable instruments. The section has laid down certain specifications, penalties etc. in
                                     the case of bouncing of cheques. The amendment to the section in 2002 increased the
                                     punishment duration as two years imprisonment.

                                     Object of Section 147 explained: Section 147 in the Act fill the element of compounding
                                     which Section 320 left out. Thus the legislative vacuum with regard to compounding of
                                     cheque bouncing cases has been filled by Section 147. It is interesting to note that the
                                     statement of objects and reasons for the 2002 Amendment in the Act, it is described that the
                                     deficiencies of Sections 138 to 142 of the Act in dealing with dishonour of cheques was one
                                     of the reason behind insertion of Section 147.
                                     Guidelines Lay Down

                                     1.   Modification of summons to the effect that the accused could make an application
                                          for compounding of the offence at the first or second hearing of the case. If an
                                          application is made, the Court can allow compounding the offence without costs.
                                                                                                         Contd...


          166                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176