Page 144 - DCOM301_INCOME_TAX_LAWS_I
P. 144

Unit 5: Exemptions and Deductions – II




            be utilized for being adjusted against the brought forward losses and the losses for the  Notes
            same year either under the same head of income but from a different source or under
            another head of income for the same year. 6 ITA No: 4324/Mum/2008. It was thus submitted
            that the order under section 263 was bad in law.

            The learned CIT Departmental Representative strongly relied on the order passed by the
            CIT and the reasoning given therein. She further submitted that the assessment order was
            contrary to the provisions of the statute and, therefore, was rightly held to be erroneous
            by the CIT. It was her contention that the 10% profits which are taxed under section 10A for
            the assessment year 2003–04 cannot be utilized for being adjusted against losses for the
            same year under different sources or heads of income or against brought forward losses.
            She submitted that such profits stand on a separate footing and cannot be considered to be
            part of the profits and gains of the business as computed under sections 29 to 43 of the Act.
            On a careful consideration of the rival contentions, we are of the view that the assessment
            order cannot be said to be erroneous since it is in accordance with the views expressed in
            several orders of different Benches of the Tribunal. In the case of Mindtree Consulting Pvt.
            Ltd. (supra), it was held that the profits which became taxable after availing of the exemption
            under section 10B of the Act were available to be adjusted against the loss assessed for the
            same year under the head “Income from other sources” as permitted under section 71.
            It may be clarified that section 10B is substantially similar to section 10A of the Act. In the
            case of Navin Bharat Industries Ltd. (supra), the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal held that
            the units under section 10A are entitled to set off their 7 ITA No: 4324/Mum/2008 losses
            against the profits from non 10A units or against other business income for the same year.
            This order deals with the reverse situation. However, the question is whether the provisions
            of sections 70 and 71 are applicable even with regard to the losses or profits assessed in
            respect of units enjoying the benefits of section 10A.
            That question was decided by the Tribunal by holding in the affirmative. In Wipro BPO
            Solutions Ltd. vs. DCIT [2010- TIOL-95-ITAT-BANG], the Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal
            was dealing with section 10B. After noting that 90% of the profits were deductible under
            the section and 10% of the profits were assessable for the assessment year 2003–04, it was
            held that the business loss brought forward from the assessment year 2001–02 can be set
            off against the 10% profits assessed under section 10B for the assessment year 2003–04. In
            DCIT vs. A V Thomas Leather & Allied Products Ltd. [2009-TIOL-434-ITAT-MAD], the
            Chennai Bench of the Tribunal held that the loss in respect of a unit under section 10A can
            be set off against the profit earned for the same year by the non 10A units. In the case of
            Honeywell International India () Ltd. vs. DCIT (2007) 108 TTJ (Del) 924, the Delhi Bench of
            the Tribunal was dealing with the loss of an unit eligible under section 10A for the
            assessment year 2003–04. It was held that the loss can be set off against the profits of any
            other unit or business under sections 70 and 71 of the Act. Again the Mumbai Bench of the
            Tribunal in the case of Sovika Infotek Ltd. vs. ITO [2008-TIOL- 343-ITAT-MUM], dealing
            with section 10B, held that the provisions of sections 70 and 71 were applicable and the loss
            from the 10A 8 ITA No: 4324/Mum/2008 unit can be adjusted against the income from
            other sources for the same year.

            Thus there is ample authority in the form of orders of different Benches of the Tribunal for
            the proposition that the 10% profits of an unit under section 10A which is assessed for the
            assessment year 2003–04 are not different in any way from the profits of any other business
            carried on by the assessee and, therefore, any losses for the same year or brought forward
            from an earlier year can be adjusted against those profits. The loss arising in the section
            10A unit is also eligible for being adjusted against the profits of any other business for the
            same year or against income under other heads of income.
                                                                               Contd...



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   139
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149