Page 171 - DECO303_INDIAN_ECONOMY_ENGLISH
P. 171

Indian Economy




                    Notes          to be casually called “Tokyo Codes”. Numerous of these codes were sooner or later discussed in
                                   the Uruguay Round and became multidimensional promises acknowledged by all WTO members.
                                   Only four continued “plurilateral” agreements and these related to government procurement,
                                   bovine meat, civil aircraft and dairy products. In 1997, the members decided to dismiss the
                                   bovine meat and dairy agreements, leaving only the other two.

                                   10.1.4 Uruguay Round

                                   You must understand that the seeds of the Uruguay Round were sown in November 1982 at a
                                   parliamentary meeting of GATT members in Geneva. The work programme that the ministers
                                   decided designed the base for what was to become the Uruguay Round Negotiating Agenda. On
                                   the other hand, it took four more years previously ministers decided to launch the new round in
                                   September 1986, at Punta del Este, Uruguay.
                                   The round was hypothetical to finish when ministers encountered once more in Brussels in
                                   December 1990. But difference on improving agricultural trade nearly led to the failure of the
                                   talks. That indefinite time saw the first current of a final legal arrangement. This current “Final
                                   Act”, also recognised as the “Dunkel Draft” subsequently GATT Director-General, Arthur Dunkel,
                                   became the basis for the Uruguay Round negotiations.
                                   Over the subsequent two years, facilities, market access, anti-dumping rules and the creation of
                                   a new organization were the other areas of difference along with agriculture. The area of distress
                                   during the time was the major differences concerning the United States and European Union
                                   (EU) on the above issues.
                                   In November 1992, the US and the EU settled most of their differences on agriculture in a deal
                                   recognized casually as the “Blair House Accord”. By July 1993, the “Quad” (US, EU, Japan and
                                   Canada) declared substantial development in discussions on tariffs and related subjects (“market
                                   access”).

                                   You may already be aware that it took until December 15, 1993, for every subject to be lastly
                                   determined and for discussions on market access for goods and services to be determined. The
                                   WTO agreement was finally employed on April 15, 1994, by ministers from most of the 123
                                   contributing governments at a meeting in Marrakech, Morocco.




                                     Notes On the other hand, the GATT 1947 remains to be the basis concerning features
                                     dealing with trade in goods below the Uruguay Agreement.




                                     Caselet     Condition of Labourers in Malwa

                                           he GATT 1947 mentions that no prohibitions or restrictions other than duties, taxes
                                           or other charges, whether made effective through quotas, import or export licenses
                                     Tor other measures, shall be instituted or maintained by any contracting party on
                                     the importation of any product of the territory of any other contracting party or on the
                                     exportation or sale for export of any product destined for the territory of any other
                                     contracting party.
                                     The main reason for this prohibition is that quantitative restrictions (QR) can be more
                                     trade restrictive than tariff measures. Tariffs per se do not prevent entry of products, and
                                                                                                         Contd...



          166                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176