Page 99 - DMGT401Business Environment
P. 99

Business Environment




                    Notes          3.5.5 Measures to Control Inflation

                                   1.  Monetary Policy: Inflation can be controlled by controlling the supply of money in the
                                       economy. The central bank, through its monetary policy, can control inflation to a certain
                                       extent. Through various measures like CRR, SLR, Bank Rate, Open Market Operations,
                                       Moral Suasion (for details see unit of Monetary Policy), etc. The Central bank can increase
                                       or decrease the supply of currency in the economy and thus control inflation to some
                                       extent.

                                   2.  Price Controls: Another method attempted is simply instituting wage and price controls.
                                       Through its fiscal policy, the central government can also check inflation. It can not only
                                       influence the supply of money in the economy but also control or create demand - pull
                                       inflation. It also influences the production and its cost, thus also influencing the cost pull
                                       inflation.





                                     Case Study  Oil and New Economy

                                           our cannot get more old economy than to fret about the price of oil. Although the
                                           oil price is hard to miss when you come to refuel your car, economy watchers with
                                     Yany sophistication are encouraged at every turn to pay little attention. For instance,
                                     measures of “underlying” inflation exclude the oil price – too volatile, the argument goes,
                                     and no longer all that significant, one is led to suppose. Yet theory and empirical evidence
                                     suggest  that the price of oil remains a fundamental driver of the business  cycle. In all
                                     likelihood cheap oil has played a big role in creating the appearance of a “new economy”
                                     and dear oil, if the price stays up, may do more harm than many believe.
                                     In Britain, the leading advocate of the view that oil still matters has been Andrew Oswald,
                                     a professor at Warwick University. In an article in the Financial Times last year he went so
                                     far as to claim that the so-called new paradigm is almost entirely an illusion caused by a
                                     prolonged period of extremely cheap oil. Now that the price has soared and assuming that
                                     it stays relatively high, he fears that the result will be a marked slowdown in the world
                                     economy.

                                     Mr Oswald is therefore a doubly unusual fellow: an easy-money new-economy sceptic.
                                     Most new-economy sceptics want monetary policy in the United States tightened faster
                                     (because they believe the surge in labour productivity will not last and that inflationary
                                     pressures are building).  Mr Oswald, in contrast,  though a  trenchant critic  of the new
                                     economy, believes that monetary policy should be on recession watch in both Britain and
                                     America.
                                     Mr Oswald, along with Alan Carruth of the University of Kent and Mark Hooker of the
                                     Federal Reserve, published an article in 1998 which helps to makes the case for this view.
                                     The starting point is the chart, which repays careful study. The association between changes
                                     in the price of oil and, after a delay, changes in American unemployment is impressively
                                     close.  And the underlying  model which Mr Oswald  and his  collaborators adduce is
                                     persuasive and simple.  They concentrate  on the supply side  (that is,  labour-market)
                                     implications of oil, rather than on the demand side effects. Dear oil raises producers’ costs
                                     and squeezes their profit  margins. To restore those  margins, employers  strive to cut
                                     labour  costs. At  the  aggregate  level  and  for  any  given  pressure  of  demand,  higher
                                     unemployment is the result: in effect, only with more people  on the dole are workers
                                                                                                         Contd...




          92                                LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104