Page 22 - DCOM404_CORPORATE_LEGAL_FRAMEWORK
P. 22

Unit 1: Laws of Contract




             According to PHS policy, if an individual is unsure if an incident falls within the defi nition   Notes


             of scientific misconduct, he or she may call the Research Integrity Officer to discuss the
             situation informally.
          Source: ultrasonics.bioen.illinois.edu/admin/upload/Case%20study_SZ.doc
          1.5 Consideration


          One of the essential elements of a valid contract is that it must be supported by consideration. In
          simple terms consideration is what a promisor demands as the price for his promise. The term
          consideration is used in the sense of quid pro quo, i.e., “something in return”. This something or
          consideration need not be in terms of money. This “something” may even be some benefi t, right,
          interest or profit accruing to one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given,

          suffered or undertaken by the other party. Also a promise by one party may be consideration for
          the promise of other party. Thus, a person who makes a promise to do something usually does so
          as a return of equivalent of some loss, damage or inconvenience that may have been occasioned
          to the other party in respect of the promise. The benefit so received, or the loss, damage or

          inconvenience so caused is regarded, in law, as the consideration for the promise.

          Section 2 (d) defines consideration as: “When at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any
          other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do
          or to abstain from doing, something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration
          for the promise”.

          The object of the consideration should not be
          1.   Forbidden by law
          2.   Defeat the provision of law
          3.   Injurious to person or property

          4.   Agreement injurious to public policy
          5.   Agreement opposed to public policy ( section 23)

                 Example: A agrees to sell his motorcycle to B for ` 20,000. Here B’s promise to pay the
          sum of ` 20,000 is the consideration for A’s promise to deliver the motorcycle, and A’s promise to
          deliver the motorcycle is the consideration for B’s promise to pay ` 20,000.
          An agreement without consideration is void (nudum pactum) s.25. However, the following
          agreement without consideration is valid agreement.
          1.   Natural love and affection
          2.   Compensation for past voluntary services
          3.   Promise to pay a time based debt
          4.   Creation of agency does not require consideration

          Rules regarding Consideration

          The following rules as regards consideration emerge from the definition given in s.2 (d):

          1.   Consideration must move at the desire of the promisor and therefore an act done by the
               promise at the desire of a third party is not a consideration.  (Durga Prasad v/s Baldeo)
               A building at a market place at the order of the collector was to be made for which the
               defendant, a tenant made promise to pay, later refused was held not liable as consideration
               is from third party.




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    17
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27