Page 228 - DECO405_MANAGERIAL_ECONOMICS
P. 228

Unit 14: Calculation of National Income




             million more people in India became poor or remained in poverty over 2008 and 2009  Notes
             than would have been poor had the pre-crisis (2004-07) growth  rates been maintained
             over these two years.
             The 2009 Asia-Pacific Wealth Report notes that the HNWI population in India is also expected
             to be more than three times its 2008 size by the year 2018, with emergent wealth playing a
             key role. Like China, relatively few among the current HNWI population (13%, compared
             to 22% in Japan) have inherited their wealth and even fewer (9%) are over the age of 66.
             Question
             What does the case say about distribution of income in India?
          Source: timesofindia.indiatimes.com

          14.4 Problems in Measuring National Income

          The major problems that hinder the calculation of national income using a particular method
          have already been discussed before along with the methods. Now let’s discuss the problems that
          occur, in general.
          The difficulties in measurement of national income are:

          1.   National income measures domestic economic performance and not social welfare. For
               real economic growth, there should be strong positive correlation between the two.
          2.   National Income understates social welfare-non-market transactions like home-makers
               service and do-it-yourself projects are not counted.
          3.   National Income does not measure an increase in leisure or work satisfaction or changes
               in product quality.
          4.   National Income does not accurately reflect changes in environment like oil spills cleanup
               is measured as positive output but increased in pollution is not measured as negative.
          5.   Per capital income is a more meaningful measure of living standards than total national
               income.
          6.   There is a problem of double counting. However, problem of double counting could be
               avoided by utilizing the value added approach. For example, the wheat that is used to
               make bread is an “intermediate good”. The value of the bread only is counted as part of
               GNP and we do not count the value of wheat sold to the miller and the value of flour sold
               to the baker.
          7.   Problems of depreciation  estimation as  there are  different methods  of calculating  or
               estimating  depreciation.

          8.   Inclusion or exclusion of certain items in national income accounting can cause confusion.
               (a)  Imputed rent of owner occupied houses is also included in calculation of national
                    income.

               (b)  Imputed value of goods and services produced for self consumption are included.
               (c)  Sale and purchase of second hand goods are excluded.
               (d)  Imputed rent of owner occupied houses and production for self-consumption are
                    included.

               (e)  Incomes from illegal activities are not included.
               (f)  Direct taxes such as Income tax are paid by employees from their salaries are included.





                                            LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                  223
   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233