Page 268 - DCOM304_INDIAN_FINANCIAL_SYSTEM
P. 268

Unit 13: Mutual Funds and Insurance Services




          The Sharpe ratio tells us whether the returns of a portfolio are due to smart investment decisions  Notes
          or a result of excess risk. This measurement is very useful because although one portfolio or
          fund can reap higher returns than its peers, it is only a good investment if those higher returns
          do not come with too much additional risk. The greater a portfolio's Sharpe ratio, the better its
          risk-adjusted performance will be.
          A variation of the Sharpe ratio is the Sortino ratio, which removes the effects of upward price
          movements on standard deviation to instead measure only the return against downward price
          volatility.


                 Example: Consider two portfolios A and B. On the basis of information given below,
          compare the performance of portfolios A and B.

              Portfolio   Return      Risk-free        Excess           Portfolio risk
                           I (R M)    rate (R F)    return (R F – R M)      (SD)
                A           21          8                13                 10
                B           17          8                 9                  8

          Solution:
                 A = 13/10 = 1.3               B = 9/8 = 1.125
          Reward per unit of risk in case of Portfolio A is relatively higher. Hence its performance is said
          to be good.

          Treynor Portfolio Performance Measure (aka: reward to volatility ratio)

          This measure was developed by Jack Treynor in 1965. Treynor (helped developed CAPM) argues
          that, using the characteristic line, one can determine the relationship between a security and the
          market. Deviations from the characteristic line (unique returns) should cancel out if you have a
          fully diversified portfolio.

          Treynor's Composite Performance Measure: He was interested in a performance measure that
          would apply to all investors regardless of their risk preferences. He argued that investors would
          prefer a CML with a higher slope (as it would place them on a higher utility curve). The slope of
          this portfolio possibility line is:

                            R M   R F
                       Ti =
                                1
          Where: R = Market Return, RFR = Risk Free return, and      = SD
                                                         m
          A larger Ti value indicates a larger slope and a better portfolio for all investors regardless of
          their risk preferences. The numerator represents the risk premium and the denominator represents
          the risk of the portfolio; thus the value, T, represents the portfolio's return per unit of systematic
          risk. All risk-averse investors would want to maximize this value.
          The Treynor measure only measures systematic risk – it automatically assumes an adequately
          diversified portfolio.
          You can compare the T measures for different portfolios. The higher the T value, the better the
          portfolio performance. For instance, the T value for the market is:
                            R m  RFR
                      Tm =
                                m




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   263
   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273