Page 32 - DCOM506_DMGT502_STRATEGIC_MANAGEMENT
P. 32

Strategic Management




                    Notes          5.  It fosters risk-taking and experimentation.
                                   6.  A good vision is competitive, original and unique. It makes sense in the market place.
                                   7.  A good vision represents integrity. It is truly genuine and can be used for the benefit of
                                       people.


                                     Did u know?    When does a vision fail?

                                     A vision may fail when it is:
                                     1.   Too specific (fails to contain a degree of uncertainty)
                                     2.   Too vague (fails to act as a landmark)
                                     3.   Too inadequate (only partially addresses the problem)

                                     4.   Too unrealistic (perceived as unachievable)
                                   A.D. Jick observes that a vision is also likely to fail when leaders spend 90 percent of their time
                                   articulating it to their staff and only 10 percent of their time in implementing it. There are two
                                   other reasons for vision failure:
                                   1.  Adaptability of vision over time
                                   2.  Presence of competing visions

                                   2.2.6 Formulating a Vision Statement


                                   Generally, in most cases, vision is inherited from the founder of the organisation who creates a
                                   vision.  Otherwise,  some  of  the  senior  strategists in  the  organisation  formulate  the  vision
                                   statement as a part of strategic planning exercise.

                                   Nutt and Backoff identify three different processes for crafting a vision:
                                   1.  Leader-dominated Approach: The CEO provides the strategic vision for the organisation.
                                       This approach is criticized because it is against the philosophy of empowerment, which
                                       maintains that people across the organisation should be involved in processes and decisions
                                       that affect them.
                                   2.  Pump-priming Approach: The CEO provides visionary ideas and selects people and groups
                                       within the organisation to further develop those ideas within the broad parameters set
                                       out by the CEO.
                                   3.  Facilitation Approach: It is  a “co-creating approach” in which a wide range of people
                                       participate in the process of developing  and articulating  a vision. The CEO acts as a
                                       facilitator, orchestrating  the crafting  process. According  to Nutt  and Backoff, it is this
                                       approach that is likely to produce better visions and more successful organisational change
                                       and performance as more people have contributed to its development and will therefore
                                       be more willing to act in accordance with it.

                                   While the above frameworks identify the extent to which there is involvement throughout the
                                   organisation in the development of  the vision, they do  not address the specifics  on how to
                                   develop the actual vision itself. Some routines for producing vision are outlined in Table 2.2.










          26                                LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37