Page 273 - DCOM508_CORPORATE_TAX_PLANNING
P. 273

Corporate Tax Planning




                    Notes            several tax years and, therefore, result in tax deferral). For example, a plan of liquidation
                                     documented in the corporate minutes could state that multiple liquidating distributions
                                     will occur and explain the business reasons for this.
                                     Recovering Stock Basis before Recognising Gain

                                     Generally, shareholders are allowed to recover their entire basis before recognising gain
                                     (Rev. Ruls. 68-348 and 85-48; and Quinn, 35 B.T.A. 412 (1937), acq. 1937-1 C.B. 21). The full
                                     amount (100%) of all distributions made after basis has been recovered is recognised as
                                     gain.
                                     Observation:  The current reduction of the maximum tax rate on capital gains and on
                                     qualifying dividends to 15% through 2012 somewhat mitigates the traditional preference
                                     for a sale or exchange transaction (e.g., a Sec. 331 liquidation payment) over a dividend.
                                     However, under current law, distributions made after 2012 will be taxed at higher capital
                                     gain and dividend rates. Therefore, taxpayers should consider making the fi nal distribution
                                     before 2013.

                                     When a shareholder holds several blocks of the same class of stock (acquired at different
                                     times and at different prices) and several distributions are made in complete liquidation,
                                     each distribution is allocated among the different blocks in proportion to the number of
                                     shares in each block.
                                     Claiming a Loss on a Liquidation

                                     A shareholder may claim a loss on a series of distributions only in the year the loss is
                                     definitely sustained. Generally, a loss cannot be recognised until the tax year in which


                                     the final distribution is received. However, there have been some exceptions to this rule
                                     (e.g., in the year the last substantial distribution was made because the amount of the fi nal
                                     distribution was then determinable with reasonable certainty).
                                     Requesting a Prompt Assessment
                                     The normal period for assessment of tax is three years from the date the return is fi led. A
                                     corporation can accelerate the period in which the IRS can assess tax by requesting a prompt
                                     assessment of tax [Sec. 6501(d)]. Form 4810, Request for Prompt Assessment under Internal
                                     Revenue Code Section 6501(d), is used to request a prompt assessment. The request limits
                                     the time for assessing tax or beginning a court action to collect the tax to 18 months from

                                     the date the request is filed. It does not extend the time in which an assessment can be made
                                     beyond three years from the date the return was fi led.
                                     One example of a situation when a request for prompt assessment might be appropriate
                                     is the liquidation of a corporation because of shareholder differences. If the IRS assesses
                                     an additional tax liability after the assets have been divided among the shareholders,

                                     disagreements could arise regarding who is responsible for the deficiency. On the other

                                     hand, filing a request for prompt assessment when there is only one shareholder might not
                                     be warranted.
                                     Questions
                                     1.   Study and analyse the case.

                                     2.   Write down the case facts.
                                     3.   What do you infer from it?

                                   Source: http://www.aicpa.org/publications/taxadviser/2012/september/pages/casestudy_sep2012.aspx








          268                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278