Page 142 - DCOM509_ADVANCED_AUDITING
P. 142

Unit 8: Auditing in Computerized Environment




          8.4.1 Advantages of using GAS                                                         Notes

          The open standards in hardware and software make hardware and software, compatible with
          each other. Due to this, new versions, new products and new brands are coming to the market
          very fast. The rate at which new products and versions are launched, make it difficult for an
          individual to keep track of these changes. This is especially true for an external auditor. External
          auditor has to audit various clients each using different hardware, software, and database and
          application software. Even the same client may be using different version of operating systems,
          database and application software. No one can learn so many Embedded Audit Modules (even
          if  there is one) and utility software. With the use of GAS, auditing becomes independent of
          application, database and operating system.

          General Audit Software (GAS), however, has certain limitations in as much as that:
              It can undertake only ex-post auditing and not concurrent auditing i.e. it enables evidence
               to be collected only on an application system after the fact, when the data has already been
               processed.  As such, situations where the time  lag between  occurrence of an error  in
               application system and its possible identification using  GAS are  critical (for  example
               where multiple users access a shared database) auditors must use specialized rather than
               GAS.
              GAS has limited ability to verify processing logic of an application system. To overcome
               this problem, test data must be designed specifically to determine how application system
               handles exceptional conditions.

              GAS has limited ability to determine propensity of error. Auditors are concerned with
               whether application systems have been designed appropriately to accommodate change;
               otherwise errors are likely to result when changes to the system must be undertaken.
               Unfortunately, auditors can obtain  little evidence  using GAS  on application  system’s
               capability to accommodate change. Instead, evidence must be obtained in different ways.


                 Example:  Reviewing management control framework, examining ways  application
          systems are designed and program codes are written.

          8.4.2 Other Auditing Software


              Some types of audit software packages have been developed for specific use in financial,
               insurance and health services. Although these packages are generalized, they are oriented
               towards a particular industry and provide commands that invoke common audit functions
               needed within that industry. One such package is CAPS package developed by Brisbane
               based Kendall Chartered Accountants. This package provides for loan arrears audit, interest
               audit, term deposit interest audit, ledger balances and transactions audit, dormancy audit
               and legislative compliance audit. Advantages of such audit software over GAS are that
               they run efficiently and are easier to use by the  auditors within the specific industry.
               However, more limited domain is also disadvantageous to that extent.
              Similarly an organization dealing with uniform operating  and database management
               systems and application packages can also develop in-house packages or programmes,
               which may answer standard audit queries, generate pre-designed statements and exception
               reports. However, for each new query, a new programme may have to be developed. Such
               embedded audit software is very easy to use and serve good purpose for internal auditing
               where auditors have to audit the same system again and again.





                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   137
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147