Page 100 - DCAP310_INTRODUCTION_TO_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_AND_EXPERT_SYSTEMS
P. 100

Introduction to Artificial Intelligence & Expert Systems




                    Notes          Note that we can easily check the validity, contingency, or unsatisfiability of a sentence can
                                   easily by looking at the truth table for the propositional constants in the sentence.

                                   Propositional Entailment

                                   Validity, satisfiability, and unsatisfiability are properties of individual sentences. In logical
                                   reasoning, we are not so much concerned with individual sentences as we are with the relationships
                                   between sentences. In particular, we would like to know, given some sentences, whether other
                                   sentences are or are not logical conclusions. This relative property is known as logical entailment.
                                   When we are speaking about Propositional Logic, we use the phrase propositional entailment.
                                   A set of sentences ∆ logically entails a sentence ϕ (written ∆ |= ϕ) if and only if every interpretation
                                   that satisfies ∆ also satisfies ϕ. For example, the sentence p logically entails the sentence (p ∨ q).
                                   Since a disjunction is true whenever one of its disjuncts is true, then (p ∨ q) must be true whenever
                                   p is true. On the other hand, the sentence p does not logically entail (p ∧ q). A conjunction is true
                                   if and only if both of its conjuncts are true, and q may be false. Of course, any set of sentences
                                   containing both p and q does logically entail (p ∧ q). Note that the relationship of logical entailment
                                   is a logical one. Even if the premises of a problem do not logically entail the conclusion, this
                                   does not mean that the conclusion is necessarily false, even if the premises are true. It just means
                                   that it is possible that the conclusion is false. Once again, consider the case of (p ∧ q). Although p
                                   does not logically entail this sentence, it is possible that both p and q are true and, therefore,
                                   (p ∧ q) is true. However, the logical entailment does not hold because it is also possible that q is
                                   false and, therefore, (p ∧ q) is false.

                                   Self Assessment

                                   State whether the following statements are true or false:
                                   3.  Validity, satisfiability, and unsatisfiability are properties of individual sentences.
                                   4.  A sentence is falsifiable if and only if it is satisfied by at least one interpretation.


                                   6.3 Well-formed Formula (WFF)

                                   In mathematical logic, a well-formed formula, shortly WFF, often simply formula, is a word
                                   (i.e. a finite sequence of symbols from a given alphabet) which is part of a formal language. A
                                   formal language can be considered to be identical to the set containing all and only its formulas.
                                   A formula is a syntactic formal object that can be informally given a semantic meaning.



























          94                                LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105