Page 32 - DCAP302_ENTERPRISE_RESOURCE_PLANNING
P. 32

Enterprise Resource Planning




                    notes          they were centralized; (e) Link parallel activities instead of integrating their results; (f) Put the
                                   decision point where the work is performed, and build control into the process; and (g) Capture
                                   information once and at the source.
                                   Davenport & Short (1990) argue that BPR requires taking a broader view of both IT and business
                                   activity, and of the relationships between them. IT should be viewed as more than an automating
                                   or mechanizing force: to fundamentally reshape the way business is done.
                                   Business activities should be viewed as more than a collection of individual or even functional
                                   tasks: in a process view for maximizing effectiveness. IT and BPR have recursive relationship. IT
                                   capabilities should support business processes, and business processes should be in terms of the
                                   capabilities IT can provide. Davenport & Short (1990) refer to this broadened, recursive view of IT
                                   and BPR as the new industrial engineering.

                                   Business processes represent a new approach to coordination across the firm; IT’s promise –
                                   and its ultimate impact – is to be the most powerful tool for reducing the costs of coordination
                                   (Davenport  &  Short  1990).  Davenport  &  Short  (1990)  outline  the  following  capabilities  that
                                   reflect the roles that IT can play in BPR: Transactional, Geographical, Automatical, Analytical,
                                   Informational, Sequential, Knowledge Management, Tracking, and Disintermediation.

                                   Teng et al. (1994) argue that the way related functions participate in a process – i.e., the functional
                                   coupling of a process – can be differentiated along two dimensions: degree of mediation and degree
                                   of collaboration. They define the Degree of Mediation of the process as the extent of sequential flow
                                   of input and output among participating functions. They define the Degree of Collaboration of
                                   the process is the extent of information exchange and mutual adjustment among functions when
                                   participating in the same process. In their framework, information technology is instrumental
                                   in  Reducing  the  Degree  of  Mediation  and  Enhancing  the  Degree  of  Collaboration.  Also,
                                   innovative uses of IT would inevitably lead many firms to develop new, coordination-intensive
                                   structures, enabling them to coordinate their activities in ways that were not possible before. Such
                                   coordination-intensive structures may raise the organization’s capabilities and responsiveness,
                                   leading to potential strategic advantages.

                                   What is the role of the is function in Bpr?

                                   Although, BPR has its roots in IT management, it is primarily a Business Initiative that has broad
                                   consequences in terms of satisfying the needs of customers and the firm’s other constituents
                                   (Davenport & Stoddard 1994). The IS group may need to play a behind-the-scenes advocacy role,
                                   convincing senior management of the power offered by IT and process redesign. It would also
                                   need to incorporate the skills of process measurement, analysis, and redesign. The CIGNA IS
                                   group had to develop a new set of basic values that reflected a change in focus from technology
                                   to a focus on business processes and results (Caron et al. 1994). The specific business divisions led
                                   the BPR initiatives; IS groups served as partners in enabling the radical changes.
                                   Is there a BPR Methodology?


                                   Bpr: all or nothing?: insights from cigna
                                   At  CIGNA  BPR  meant  “breakthrough  innovation  focused  on  customer  needs”  (Caron  et  al.
                                   1994). BPR was essentially driven by the senior management’s strategic planning process that
                                   had concluded that the mix of business in its portfolio needed to change. It was viewed as a
                                   vehicle to realign strategy, operations, and systems to deliver significantly increased financial
                                   results. Caron et al. (1994) argue that the real life story of BPR at CIGNA represents a contrast to
                                   the general prescriptions of “radical” “all-or-nothing” organizational transformation. At CIGNA,
                                   BPR started out as an experimental pilot. The knowledge from the success of this initiative was
                                   disseminated for implementing other BPR projects. The BPR initiative was sustained “from the
                                   bottom up, with learning transferred “across.”” At CIGNA, the prerequisite for BPR success




          26                               LoveLy professionaL university
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37