Page 77 - DCAP311_DCAP607_WIRELESS_NETWORKS
P. 77

Unit 4: Wireless Networks Types and PAN Technologies




             efficient way to implement system management and controls—including preventing the   Notes
             infiltration of unauthorized devices. At the same time, with the number of users steadily
             growing, finding an effective way to segregate student and public access from the private
             faculty/staff wireless  network was  also  becoming  a  priority. With no  single  point of
             management, the IT staff was spending increasing amounts of time performing hands-on
             maintenance and troubleshooting of individual components throughout all the different
             school buildings. They also had to find a way to abate the growing number of students
             and faculty using their own personal wireless  devices  on the school  network (laptops,
             mobile phones and other hand held devices).  These critical issues  related to system
             management and security became a drain on IT department resources which translated
             into an unacceptable level of cost for the school system.
             Performance. The legacy wireless network lacked the required throughput capability and,
             in turn, the predictability needed for running critical school applications. The old network
             would  often  exhibit  “shaky”  performance  when  used  for  state  required  Standards  of
             Learning (SOL) testing. As a result, ensuring Quality of Service (QoS) during SOL testing
             and other on-line assessments became a high priority concern for the IT staff. With a plan
             for growth in the number of wireless devices in classrooms, GCPS needed a scalable system
             that provided all the required capacity without compromise in performance.
             Scalability. Like most public school systems, GCPS is subject to the push to devote more
             space to learning and less to other areas of school operations. With physical space at a
             premium, the IT department was running out of viable options for housing their expanding
             LAN equipment. This dilemma made the idea of expanding the wireless network under a
             centralized system an even more attractive option.
             The Meru Solution
             With its list of technology priorities in hand, a short window of opportunity to deploy a new
             solution, and a fixed budget, GCPS turned to their technology service partner, Advanced
             Network Systems, to find a wireless system that met all of their requirements. During the
             summer of 2008, GCPS replaced its legacy system with a Meru solution consisting of an
             MC3100 controller and 74 AP311 dual radio access points. The solution was deployed at
             the County's high school, middle school and two elementary schools.

             Reaping the Benefits of Meru
             According to Dale Herring, the benefits realized as a result of the Meru solution deployment
             were  numerous.  “We've  been  extremely  pleased  with  Meru.  We  now  have  a  really
             powerful system that has all the capabilities that we need,” said Herring. He added, “From
             an IT perspective, the Meru system's centralized configuration and management features
             have cut down on a lot of time we used to spend maintaining all the different systems we
             had.” Herring noted that another benefit of the Meru system is its high level of flexibility.
             “Because we now have a consistent wireless solution, device compatibility issues have been
             eliminated; this allows GCPS' IT team to easily share laptops and other devices between
             schools when demands shift. Since there are no configuration changes to perform, devices
             move seamlessly from school to school. Having this kind of flexibility means we spend less
             of our time on management and a smaller budget needed because we don't have to have
             as many devices at every school.” Herring noted, “One of the big reasons we chose a Meru
             solution is its compatibility and technology investment protection. No matter what type of
             device is connected to the network, a/b/g or n, Meru's access points can accommodate all
             the least common denominator in terms of performance as we go forward.”

             Expanding on the idea of better system performance Herring added, “Because Standards
             of Learning testing is considered a mission-critical application for the school district, we
             need to have guaranteed quality of service when it comes to its implementation. ‘Hiccups'
                                                                                 Contd...




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    71
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82