Page 163 - DENG401_Advance Communication Skills
P. 163

Advanced Communication Skills




                    Notes          Going forward from the aforesaid understanding, we see that reading comprehension requires
                                   an ability to understand the meaning of what is put forth, as well as the competence to re-state
                                   the meaning clearly. We learn that the meaning of a sentence is not the sum total of the meanings
                                   of the individual words that constitute it. Therefore, to understand a passage fully, one should
                                   know the nature of the words, as well as the function of the ‘inter sentence and inter paragraph
                                   links’. This ability can be acquired through intensive and disciplined practice.

                                   Passages for Comprehension

                                     Education has always had two objects
                                     on the one hand, to give skill; and on the other, to impart a vaguer thing which we may
                                     call wisdom. The  role of skill has become very much larger than it  used to be and is
                                     increasingly threatening to oust the role of wisdom. At the same time it must be admitted
                                     that wisdom in our world is useless except for those who realize the great part played by
                                     skills, for it is increase of skill that is the distinctive feature of your world.

                                     Although scientific skill is necessary, it is by no means sufficient. A dictatorship of men of
                                     science would very soon become horrible. Skill without wisdom may prove to be purely
                                     destructive. For this reason, if for no other, it is of great importance that those who receive
                                     a scientific education should not be merely scientific, but should have some understanding
                                     of that kind of wisdom which, if it can be imparted at all, can only be imparted by the
                                     cultural side of education. Science enables us to know the means to any chosen end, but it
                                     does not help us to decide upon what ends should be pursued. If you wish to exterminate
                                     the human race, it will show you how to do it. If you wish to make the human race so
                                     numerous that all are on the very verge of starvation, it will show you how to do that. If
                                     you wish to secure adequate prosperity for the whole human race, science will tell you
                                     what you must do. But it will not tell you whether one of these ends is more desirable than
                                     another.  Nor will it give  you that  instinctive understanding of human  beings that is
                                     necessary if your measures are not to arouse fierce opposition which only ferocious tyranny
                                     can quell. It cannot teach you patience, it cannot teach you sympathy, it cannot teach you
                                     a sense of human dignity. These things, in so far as they can be taught in formal education,
                                     are most likely to emerge from the learning of history and great literature.
                                                                     (By Bertrand Russell From: Fact and Fiction, 1960)

                                     Questions
                                     1.   What are the two objects of education?
                                     2.   Why is it necessary to study history and great literature?
                                     3.   Bring out the distinction between ‘knowledge’ and ‘wisdom’?

                                     I am  always amazed when I hear people say that  sport creates  goodwill between  the
                                     nations,  and that  if only  the common people of  the world could meet one another at
                                     football or cricket, they would have no inclination to meet on the battlefield.

                                     Nearly all the sports practised nowadays are competitive. You play to win, and the game
                                     has little meaning unless you do your utmost to win… Anyone who has played even in a
                                     school football match knows this. At the international level sport is frankly mimic warfare.
                                     But the significant thing is not the behaviour of the players but the attitude of the spectators,
                                     of the nations who work themselves into furies over these absurd contests, and seriously
                                     believe-at any rate for sort periods-that running, jumping and kicking a ball are tests of
                                     national virtue.
                                                                                                         Contd...




          156                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168