Page 209 - DMGT409Basic Financial Management
P. 209

Basic Financial Management




                    Notes          Assumption

                                   1.   Capital markets are perfect: Investors are rational as information is freely available,
                                       transaction cost are nil, securities are divisible and no investor can influence the market

                                       price of the share.
                                   2.   There are no taxes: No difference between tax rates on divisible and capital gains.



                                   3.   The firm has a fixed investment policy: Which will not change. So if the retained earnings
                                       are reinvested, there will not be any change in the risk of the firm. So K remains same.

                                   4.   Floatation costs does not exist:
                                       The substance of MM arguments may be stated as below:
                                       (a)   If the company retains the earnings instead of giving it out as dividends, the share
                                            holders enjoy capital appreciation, which is equal to the earnings, retained.
                                       (b)   If the company distributes the earnings by the way of dividends instead of retention,
                                            the shareholders enjoy the dividend, which is equal to the amount by which his capital
                                            would have been appreciated had the company chosen to retain the earnings.
                                   Hence, the division of earnings between dividends and retained earnings is irrelevant from the
                                   point of view of shareholders.

                                   Criticisms

                                   MM theory of division irrelevance is based on some assumptions. When these assumptions hold
                                   good, the conclusions derived by them are logically consistent and intuitively appealing. But the
                                   assumption will not hold water in the real world. So MM theory lacks practical relevance. The
                                   following are some of the limitations.

                                   1.   Tax differentials: MM’s assumption that taxes does not exist is far from reality. Dividends
                                       are not taxed where as tax is levied on capital gains. So the shareholders may prefer
                                       dividend to capital gains.
                                   2.   Floatation cost: MM argue that payment of dividend and raising external funds are

                                       equivalent. This is not true in practice due to the presence of flotation costs. So a rupee of
                                       dividend cannot be replaced by a rupee by external funds. So it is advantageous to retain
                                       the earnings.
                                   3.   Transaction costs: In the absence of transition cost a rupee of capital value can be converted
                                       into a rupee of current income and vice versa. This implies that if the dividends are not
                                       paid, the shareholders desiring current income can sell a part of their holdings without
                                       incurring transaction cost. Because of the presence of the transaction cost, investors may
                                       prefer current dividend than retained earnings.
                                   4.   Diversifi cation: If the company retains the earnings, investors cannot diversify their
                                       portfolios. As the investors are willing to pay a higher value to the company which pays
                                       more current dividend.

                                   5.   Uncertainty: MM argues that the prices of the 2 firms which are exactly identical in all the

                                       respect except with the dividend policy cannot be different. But this is not true due to “bird
                                       in hand argument”.











          202                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214