Page 32 - DMGT102_MERCANTILE_LAWS_I
P. 32

Mercantile Laws-I




                    Notes          2.8.3 Quantum Meruit

                                   The phrase ‘quantum meruit’ means ‘as much as merited’ or ‘as much as earned’. The general rule
                                   of law is that unless a person has performed his obligations in full, he cannot claim performance
                                   from the other. But in certain cases, when a person has done some work under a contract, and
                                   other party repudiated the contract, or some event happens which makes the further performance
                                   of the contract impossible, then the party who has performed the work can claim remuneration
                                   for the work he has already done. The right to claim quantum meruit does not arise out of the
                                   contract as the right to damages does; it is a claim on the quasi-contractual obligation which
                                   the law implies in the circumstances [Patel Engg. Co. Ltd v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, AIR (1975)
                                   Pat. 212].
                                   The claim on ‘quantum meruit’ arises in the following cases:
                                   1.   When a contract is discovered to be unenforceable (s.65). When an agreement is discovered
                                       to be void or becomes void, any person who has received any advantage under such
                                       agreement or contract is bound to restore it, or to make compensation for it to the person
                                       from he received it.

                                          Example:
                                        (i) A pays B ` 1,000 in consideration of B’s promising to deliver his dog. The dog is dead at
                                        the time of the promise. The agreement is void, but B must repay A the 1,000 rupees.
                                       (ii) A contracts with B to deliver to him 250 kilos of rice before the 1st of May. A delivers
                                       130 kilos only before that day and none after. B retains the 130 kilos after the 1st of May. He
                                       is bound to pay A for them.
                                       (iii) A, a singer, contracts with B, the manager of a theatre, to sing at his theatre for two
                                       nights every week during the next two months, and B engages to pay her ` 100 for each
                                       night’s performance. On the sixth night, A willfully absents herself from the theatre and B,
                                       in consequence, rescinds the contract. B must pay A for the fi ve nights on which she had
                                       sung.
                                   2.   When one party abandons or refuses to perform the contract. Where there is a breach of
                                       contract, the aggrieved party is entitled to claim reasonable compensation for what he has
                                       done under the contract.


                                          Example:  C, an owner of a magazine, engaged P to write a book to be published
                                   in installments in his magazine. After a few installments were published, the magazine was
                                   abandoned. Held, P could claim payment on quantum meruit for the part already published
                                   [Planche v. Colburn (1831) 8 Bing. 14].

                                   3.   When a contract is divisible and the party not in default, has enjoyed the benefit of the part
                                       performance, the party in default may sue on quantum meruit.
                                   4.   When an indivisible contract is completely but badly performed.  When an indivisible
                                       contract for a lumpsum is completely performed, but badly, the person who has performed
                                       can claim the lump sum less deduction for bad work.

                                          Example:  A agreed to decorate B’s flat for a lumpsum of ` 750. A did the work but B

                                   complained for faulty workmanship. It cost B ` 204 to remedy the defect. Held, A could recover
                                   from B ` 750 less ` 204 [Hoening v. Isaacs (1952) AIR 11 E.R. 176].









          26                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37