Page 37 - DMGT206_PRODUCTION_AND_OPERATIONS_MANAGEMENT
P. 37

Production and Operations Management




                    Notes          A business must adopt a strategy that enables it to secure the resources needed to effectively
                                   remain at the cutting edge of technological advances in the pursuit of creating and retaining the
                                   customers the firm wants. This is the first requirement. History is rife with firms that failed to
                                   see new technologies coming. In his book, The Innovator’s Dilemma, Professor Clayton Christensen
                                   helps explain why first rate companies that listen to their customers are not able to respond to
                                   new competitors who use “disruptive” technologies.

                                   Christensen uses the example of the diesel locomotive to illustrate how disruptive technologies
                                   “sneak up” until it is too late for the previously dominant firms to respond. When the diesel
                                   locomotive was introduced, it did not match the performance of the steam locomotive. Baldwin,
                                   the leading locomotive manufacturer, scoffed at this upstart and proclaimed, “They will never
                                   replace the steam locomotive”! This was true for some time, but little by little, diesel locomotives
                                   improved and before Baldwin knew it, by 1950 diesels had the lion’s share of the market. By
                                   then, it was too late for Baldwin to respond.
                                   Second, ‘competitive advantage’ is also created when resources and capabilities owned exclusively
                                   by the organization can generate unique core competencies. This advantage is sustainable due
                                   to the lack of substitution and imitation capacities by the organization’s competitors. As the core
                                   competencies are unique, the  benefits derived  from these advantages are retained inside the
                                   organization—they are not appropriated by others.
                                   Finally, competitive advantage can come from a strong and supportive value chain. The members
                                   of the chain look at the benefits that accrue to the entire value chain. Such cooperation is possible
                                   and often seen in such value chains, e.g., increasing productivity, reducing stocks at different
                                   levels, or process improvements, etc., are undertaken by members of the value chain and the
                                   advantages that accrue benefit all members of the value chain. In addition, it is able to provide
                                   greater value to the customer.
                                   TI Cycles and Hero Cycles: Before, we discuss competitive strategies let us review the strategies
                                   adopted by TI Cycles and Hero Cycles. TI Cycles looked at itself basically as manufacturer of
                                   bicycles. In 1962, TI Cycles had a capacity to manufacture 300,000 bicycles and Hero Cycles had
                                   a capacity of 25,000. In 1999, TI Cycles had increased its capacity to 25,20,000 bicycles while the
                                   capacity of Hero Cycles had  increased to 47,00,000. Both companies followed concentration
                                   strategy. While Hero Cycles invested in assembly plants, TI Cycles manufactured all or most of
                                   the components in-house. The investments that TI Cycles made were large in comparison to
                                   Hero Cycles. The risks involved in building of additional capacity were much  higher for  TI
                                   Cycles.

                                   However, TI Cycles created for itself a high level of competency in R&D, quality and design in
                                   the  manufacture of bicycles. Due  to this,  their product development focus was on  internal
                                   developments, while  Hero Cycles used a strategy of collaborative development for its  new
                                   products. The result was that they were faster to market in bringing new products, which gave
                                   them a competitive advantage.
                                   TI Cycles adopted a strategy of concentric diversification and vertical and backward integration.
                                   It invested in steel tubes and strips, cycle chains, and its own components. It also invested small
                                   amounts in related businesses like door frames for cars, shutter products and auto components.
                                   Unlike TI Cycles, the Hero Cycle considered itself in the transportation business. Therefore, it
                                   diversified into other areas in the automotive space. This can be seen from listing of its group
                                   companies; Hero Honda Motors Limited, Hero Cycles Limited, Hero Auto Limited, Munjal
                                   Showa Limited, Majestic Auto Limited, Hero Exports, Munjal Auto Industries Limited, Sunbeam
                                   Auto Limited, Munjal Castings, Highway Industries Limited, Rockman Cycle Industries Limited,
                                   Hero Cycles Cold Rolling Division,  Munjal  Auto Components,  Satyam Auto  Components




          32                                LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42