Page 209 - DMGT302_FUNDAMENTALS_OF_PROJECT_MANAGEMENT
P. 209

Fundamentals of Project Management



                      Notes         with state guarantees, acted as a disincentive for employing rigorous financial analysis on
                                    project proposals. In addition, service providers adjusted annual revenue shortfalls against next
                                    year’s budget transfer, further undermining good financial management and tariff structures.
                                    Engineers in state-level agencies or local governments developed technical proposals and
                                    submitted them to state government for funding. With erratic budget transfers, funding requests
                                    often fell short of the estimated cost, and projects would have to be curtailed or spread out over
                                    many years. As a result, work tended to be implemented piecemeal, through many small contracts.
                                    Over time, numerous, overlapping contracts led to coordination problems, delays, and cost
                                    overruns. It also made performance monitoring very difficult, as was the case in Navi Mumbai’s
                                    water and sewerage operations before the FIRE (D) Program helped them develop a performance-
                                    based contracting system in 2003.
                                    Consequently, the system was inefficient and risk-prone. This became particularly apparent
                                    when, on the one hand, there were not enough funds for projects, while, on the other hand,
                                    agencies could not absorb the funding already available. Fund utilization was approximately
                                    80% in 1997.
                                    Projects were limited in scope and focused primarily on crucial needs or high-profile areas of
                                    the city. The system unraveled as urban populations grew disproportionately to dedicated
                                    budget allocations for infrastructure. For many years, central and state governments focused on
                                    rural development and missed the urbanizing trends unfolding across the country. Now,
                                    government resources, including staff capacity, have difficulty confronting the infrastructure
                                    needs.
                                    The alternative that the FIRE (D) Program promotes is to develop projects that can attract
                                    commercial investment and private sector participation.


                                    Self Assessment
                                    Fill in the blanks:

                                    6.   Unfortunately, India’s traditional method of developing projects does not adequately
                                         address ....................... .
                                    7.   Under its ....................... development model, from independence to the mid-1990s, the
                                         central government earmarked money for specific sectors.
                                    8.   State governments also provided ....................... for urban infrastructure, and both politicians
                                         and civil servants decided how the funding would be spent.

                                    9.   Budget allocations accounted for more than ....................... of the money spent on urban
                                         services.
                                    10.  Centrally directed credit, along with state guarantees, acted as a ....................... for employing
                                         rigorous financial analysis on project proposals.

                                    13.5 Determine True Costs of Services

                                    If local infrastructure projects are to access commercial investment from financial institutions,
                                    capital markets, and private firms, it is important that services be delivered on a sustainable
                                    basis. Central to this is the need for determining the true cost of service provision after factoring
                                    in O&M costs, asset depreciation, environmental degradation, and social objectives. Ironically,
                                    tariff subsidies are justified in the name of poor, although the poor are not usually connected to
                                    the city networks as legal users (despite often having the ability and willingness to pay). Further,
                                    since revenue shortfalls from low tariff rates are met through general taxes and grants, resources
                                    get diverted away from necessary pro-poor programs, such as primary health and education.



            204                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214