Page 306 - DMGT308_CUSTOMER_RELATIONSHIP_MANAGEMENT
P. 306

Unit 12: Customer Privacy




          with the authority to legislate on any matter not enumerated in List II of the Seventh Schedule  Notes
          (the State List) and List III of the Seventh Schedule (the Concurrent List). In the absence of specific
          data protection entries in the other lists, it would appear that entry 97 grants the Parliament the
          residuary powers needed in order to make laws on any matters it deems fit in national interest,
          including the power to enact the data protection legislation.
          12.1.6 Is there is Constitutional Right to Privacy?


          In certain countries, such as South Africa and Argentina, the right to privacy is incorporated into
          the constitution. In India, the right of privacy has been derived through judicial decisions, from
          the rights available under Articles 19(1) (a) (the fundamental right to freedom of speech and
          expression) and 21  (the right to life and personal liberty) of the Constitution. There was no
          specific discussion on the concept of privacy in the Constituent Assembly Debates. However,
          over time, the Supreme Court has held that even though the right to privacy is not expressly
          enumerated as a fundamental right, it could certainly be inferred from the fundamental rights
          guaranteed under the Constitution.
          Article 19(1) (a) states that - All citizens shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression.

          The Supreme Court has, through a series of decisions held that, even though the right to privacy
          was not enumerated as a fundamental right, it could certainly be inferred from the fundamental
          rights of the Constitution. However, these fundamental rights are not without restrictions. Just
          as Article 19(1) (a) bestows on each  citizen the fundamental right of freedom of speech and
          expression, Article 19(2) imposes restrictions on this right. It states that:

          Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent
          the State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the
          exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause in the  interests of the sovereignty  and
          integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order,
          decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.
          The necessary implication of this is that the Government can deprive a citizen of his constitutional
          right of freedom of speech and expression for any of the reasons set out in Article 19(2). By
          natural extension of this principle, the Supreme Court, in Gobind v. State of Madhya Pradesh,  held
          that a violation of personal privacy is possible with the sanction of law.
          However this position was clarified and extended in People’s Union of Civil Liberties v. the Union of
          India where  the right  of government  authorities  to  intercept,  in  the  interests  of  national
          sovereignty, messages transmitted or received by any telegraph was challenged in the context
          of wire tapping. The Supreme Court held that tapping a person’s telephone line violated his
          right to privacy, unless it was required in the gravest of grave circumstances such as in the case
          of a public emergency. This case was significant in that while the court upheld the restrictions on
          the fundamental freedoms that have been guaranteed under the constitution, it insisted that the
          government must use restraint in exercising these powers.
          All available cases on this point have been decided in the context of government actions that
          resulted in the deprivation of personal privacy of individuals. There has been no case decided in
          the context of the infringement of personal privacy by private citizens. It is therefore unclear as
          to how these precedents will apply in such cases.

          12.1.7 Existing Legislations

          There is not data protection statute in the country. However, the Information Technology Act,
          2000 (the  “IT Act”) contains provisions under which  certain Government agencies can  gain
          access to data. The IT Act was recently amended and two new sections, 43-A and 72-A, were
          inserted dealing with data protection.



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   301
   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311