Page 128 - DMGT407Corporate and Business Laws
P. 128

Unit 5: Law of Sale of Goods




          5.4.3 Risk Prima Facie Passes with Property                                           Notes

          Section 26 (First paragraph) reads: unless otherwise agreed, the goods remain at the seller’s risk
          until the property therein is transferred to the buyer, but when the property therein is transferred
          to the buyer, the goods are at the buyer’s risk whether delivery has been made or not.


                 Example: A buys goods of B and property has passed to him; but the goods remain in B’s
          warehouse and the price is unpaid. Before delivery a fire burns down the warehouse destroying
          the goods. A must pay the price of the goods as A was the owner.
          Though risk follows ownership, but the parties may agree otherwise thus separating risk from
          ownership. Thus, the parties may provide by their agreement that the risk shall pass at some
          time or on some condition not necessarily simultaneous with the passing of the property.
          The second paragraph of s. 26 says: Provided that, where delivery has been delayed through the
          fault of either buyer or seller, the goods are at the risk of the party in fault as regards any loss
          which might not have occurred but for such fault.


                 Example: D contracted to supply B 30 quintals of apple juice. Delivery was to be made in
          weekly truckloads. D crushed the apples as required and put the juice in casks. Deliveries were
          held up at the buyer’s request. Subsequently B took some deliveries and then stopped altogether.
          The juice, in the meantime, deteriorated. On B’s refusal to take up further deliveries and pay for
          them D filed a suit. Held, the buyer was liable for the loss suffered on account of deterioration
          of the juice [Demby Hamilton & Co. Ltd., v. Barden (Endeavour Wines) Ltd. (1947)1 ALL ER 435].

          Also, risk and property may be separated by a trade custom.

                 Example: A ordered furs “on approval” with invoice. By the custom of the fur trade the
          goods are at the risk of the person ordering them on approval. The furs were stolen before the
          time of approval expired. Held, the buyer must bear the loss although the property had not yet
          passed to him.
          Also, risk and property may be separated by the agreement of the parties. Further, s.40 provides
          as regards risk where goods are to delivered at a distant place. It reads: Where the seller of goods
          agrees to deliver them at his own risk at a place other than that where they are when sold, the
          buyer shall, nevertheless, unless otherwise agreed, take any risk of deterioration in the goods
          necessarily incident to the course of transit.

          Furthermore, risk and property may be separated by a term of the contract.

                 Example: One of the terms adopted by the coffee board for auction of coffee was that the
          property in the coffee knocked down to a bidder would not pass until the payment of full price
          and, in the meantime, the goods would remain with the seller but at the risk and responsibility
          of the buyer. The clause was held to be valid [Consolidated Coffee Ltd. v. Coffee Board (1980) 3
          SCC 358].

          Self Assessment

          Fill in the blanks:

          7.   In a sale of ……………..goods, the property in them is transferred to the buyer at such
               times as the parties to the contract intend it to be transferred.





                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   121
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133