Page 153 - DMGT407Corporate and Business Laws
P. 153

Corporate and Business Laws




                    Notes          (v)  A person of unsound mind is not competent to enter into a partnership.
                                   (vi)  A company, incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 can enter into a contract of
                                       partnership.

                                   (vii) Section 5 provides that the following persons are not treated as partners: (a) The members
                                       of a HUF carrying on family business as such. (b) A Burmese Buddhist husband and wife
                                       carrying on business.

                                   6.1.3 ‘Partners’, ‘Firm’ and ‘Firm Name’ (s.4)

                                    “Persons, who have entered into partnership with one another are called individually ‘partners’
                                   and collectively a ‘firm’ and the name under which their business is carried on is called the ‘firm
                                   name’”. In law, a ‘firm’ is only a convenient phrase for describing the two or more persons who
                                   constitute the partnership and the firm has no legal existence apart from those persons. Thus, if
                                   A, B and C are partners in a firm, the firm really means A, B and C taken together. Unlike a joint
                                   stock company which is a legal entity under the Companies Act, 1956, a firm has no separate
                                   existence apart from its partners. A firm is not a body corporate. The rights and obligations of
                                   the firm are in fact the rights and obligations of the partners comprising the firm. The legal
                                   position of a firm is that it cannot possess property and, therefore, it cannot be a debtor or a
                                   creditor. The rights which a partner enjoys and the duties which he owes, are enjoyed against
                                   and owed to the other partners and not to the firm; and if an action between the partners be
                                   necessary to enforce such rights and duties, the individual partners and not the firm are the
                                   parties to the action. A firm as such cannot be a member of a partnership. Further, as all the
                                   partners put together are known as ‘a firm’, the assets of the firm are joint property of the
                                   partners and the partners are personally liable for all the business obligations of the firm.
                                   This is the legal position of partnership, but in business practice, there is a trend to approximate
                                   it to an entity with a separate existence from the partners. Thus, we do talk of the assets, liabilities
                                   and goodwill of the firm. Its financial statements are prepared. Under s.25 of the Companies Act,
                                   1956, a partnership firm may be a member of a company. Also the firm is recognised as a
                                   separate unit for tax purposes. Also under order 30 of the Civil Procedure Code, actions can be
                                   instituted by or against the firm in its firm name, whether by the partners or third parties.
                                   Partners may choose any name as their firm’s name provided it does not go against the rules
                                   relating to trade name or goodwill. That is to say, the name adopted should not be such as will
                                   mislead the public into confusing them with a firm of repute already in existence. Further, s. 58(3)
                                   provides that a firm name shall not contain any of the following words, namely: Crown, Emperor,
                                   Empress, Empire, Imperial, King, Queen, Royal, or words expressing or implying the sanction,
                                   approval or patronage of Government except with the written consent of the State Government.

                                   A firm may carry the names of the partners who own it, such as: “Ram & Shyam”, or “Ram &
                                   Son”, or “Ram & Sons”, or “Ram Brothers”. Further, the use of “& Co.” after the name of one of
                                   the partners (Ram & Co.) establishes prima facie the existence of a partnership. The name may be
                                   a fictitious one also, such as “Ideal Confectionery”. Using a fictitious firm name instead of the
                                   partners’ real names has an advantage. It enhances the future sale price of the business, including
                                   goodwill by ensuring that the firm will not have to substitute names of the new owner when the
                                   selling partners leave.

                                   From the above discussion, one may infer that partnership is different from a firm. Partnership
                                   is merely an abstract legal relation between the partners. But a firm is a concrete thing signifying
                                   the collective entity for all the partners. Thus, partnership is an invisible tie which binds the
                                   partners together whereas a firm is the visible manifestation of that relationship between the
                                   partners who are bound together in a relationship of agency.





          146                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158