Page 30 - DCAP302_ENTERPRISE_RESOURCE_PLANNING
P. 30

Enterprise Resource Planning




                    notes          initiatives that are intended to achieve radically redesigned and improved work processes in a
                                   bounded time frame. Contrast between the two is provided by Davenport (1993):

                                   2.5.3 process improvement (tQm) versus process innovation (Bpr)

                                                           improvement              innovation
                                        Level of Change    Incremental              Radical
                                        Starting Point     Existing Process         Clean Slate
                                        Frequency of Change  One-time/Continuous    One-time
                                        Time Required      Short                    Long
                                        Participation      Bottom-Up                Top-Down
                                        Typical Scope      Narrow, within functions  Broad, cross-functional
                                        Risk               Moderate                 High
                                        Primary Enabler    Statistical Control      Information Technology
                                        Type of Change     Cultural                 Cultural/Structural
                                   Source: Davenport (1993, p. 11)

                                   2.6 What is a Business process?

                                   Davenport & Short (1990) define business process as “a set of logically related tasks performed
                                   to achieve a defined business outcome.” A process is “a structured, measured set of activities
                                   designed to produce a specified output for a particular customer or market. It implies a strong
                                   emphasis on how work is done within an organization” (Davenport 1993). In their view processes
                                   have two important characteristics: (i) They have customers (internal or external), (ii) They cross
                                   organizational  boundaries,  i.e.,  they  occur  across  or  between  organizational  subunits.  One
                                   technique  for  identifying  business  processes  in  an  organization  is  the  value  chain  method
                                   proposed by Porter and Millar (1985).
                                   Processes  are  generally  identified  in  terms  of  beginning  and  end  points,  interfaces,  and
                                   organization units involved, particularly the customer unit. High Impact processes should have
                                   process owners.

                                          Example: Processes include: developing a new product; ordering goods from a supplier;
                                   creating a marketing plan; processing and paying an insurance claim; etc.
                                   Processes may be defined based on three dimensions (Davenport & Short 1990):
                                   Entities: Processes take place between organizational entities. They could be Interorganizational
                                   (e.g.  EDI,  i.e.,  Electronic  data  interchange),  Interfunctional  or  Interpersonal  (e.g.  CSCW,  i.e.,
                                   computer supported cooperative work.).
                                   Objects:  Processes  result  in  manipulation  of  objects.  These  objects  could  be  Physical  or
                                   Informational.
                                   Activities: Processes could involve two types of activities: Managerial (e.g. develop a budget)
                                   and Operational (e.g. fill a customer order).

                                   What are the myths about Bpr created by the popular Literature?

                                   The  popular  management  literature  has  created  more  myth  than  practical  methodology
                                   re-engineering. The concept of BPR has been with us since about 1990, however it is widely
                                   misunderstood and has been equated to downsizing, client/server computing, quality, ABC,
                                   and  several  other  management  nostrums  of  the  past  several  years.  Based  on  interviews  and
                                   conversations with more than 200 companies, and 35 re-engineering initiatives, Davenport &
                                   Stoddard (1994) identify seven re-engineering myths.


          24                               LoveLy professionaL university
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35