Page 139 - DMGT516_LABOUR_LEGISLATIONS
P. 139

Labour Legislations




                    Notes          6.5 Problems of Trade Union

                                   Over the years, trade unions in India have been taken for a ride by outside political leaders. In
                                   the process, the interests of workers and their aspirations have been totally neglected. The Trade
                                   Union Act, 1926, did not go for recognising a representative union. As a result, multiple unions
                                   have cropped up, often with blessings from management and outsiders. The union  fi nances
                                   have not been very sound in the beginning. The average membership figures for each union

                                   remain poor and have not improved. The forces of liberalisation unleashed in the early ‘90s have
                                   strengthened the hands of employers in closing down unviable units. The new corporate ‘mantras’


                                   – productivity, performance, efficiency, survival of the fittest-have virtually pushed them to the
                                   wall, where their very survival looks uncertain. Let’s recount the factors responsible for their
                                   ever-increasing woes and depreciated status thus:
                                   6.5.1 Trade Union Leadership


                                   The nature of leadership signifi cantly  influences the union-management relations as the
                                   leadership is the linchpin of the management of trade unions. The leadership of most of the trade
                                   unions in India has been outside leadership mainly drawn from political parties.

                                   6.5.2 Reasons for Emergence of Outside Leadership

                                   Outside leadership has been playing a pivotal role in the Indian Trade Union Movement due to
                                   the inability of insiders to lead their movement. In view of the low education standards and poor
                                   command over English language which is still the principal language of labour legislation and
                                   negotiations, low level of knowledge about labour legislation, unsound financial position, fear

                                   of victimisation by the employer and lack of leadership qualities, outside leaders have come to
                                   stay. The main reason for this trend is that the Trade Unions Act, 1926, itself provided the scope
                                   for outside leadership. Section 22 of the Act requires that ordinarily not less than half of the

                                   officers of the reregistered union shall be actively engaged or employed in an industry to which
                                   the union relates. Thus, this provision provides the scope for outsiders to the tune of 50% of the

                                   office bearers. The Royal Commission of Labour (RCL) 1931 recommended for the reduction of
                                   the statutory limit of outsiders from 1/2 to 1/3 but no efforts were taken in this direction.
                                   6.5.3 Evil Effects of Outside Leadership

                                   The evil effects of outside leadership analysed by the National Commission on Labour are as
                                   follows:
                                   1.   Outside leadership undermined the purposes of Trade Unions and weakened their
                                       authority. Personal benefits and prejudices, sometimes, weighed more than unions.

                                   2.   Outside leadership has been responsible for the slow growth of Trade Unions.
                                   3.   Internal leadership has not been developed fully.
                                   4.   Most of the leaders cannot understand the workers’ problems as they do not live the life of
                                       a worker.
                                   Even though outside leadership is permissible in the initial stages it is undesirable in the long
                                   run because of many evils associated with it. Political differences of leaders have been inhibiting

                                   the formation of one union in one industry. Most of the Trade Union leaders fulfill their personal
                                   aspirations with their knowledge and experience gained in the Trade Unions.







          134                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144