Page 112 - DMGT513_DERIVATIVES_AND_RISK_MANAGEMENT
P. 112

Unit 8:  Option Pricing




          4.   The ……………..interest rate is the interest rate that may be obtained in the marketplace  Notes
               with virtually no risk.
          5.   The higher the interest rate, the lower the …………of the exercise price.

          8.2 Put-Call Parity


          Put-call is nothing but a relationship that must exist between the prices of European put and call
          options having same underlying assets, strike price and expiration date. That relationship is
          derived by the help of arbitrage arguments. Put-call parity is a classic application of arbitrage-
          based pricing – it does not instruct us on how to price either put or call options, but it gives us an
          iron law linking the two prices. Hence, if call options can be somehow priced, then the price of
          the put option is immediately known.

          Since put-call parity is a canonical arbitrage argument, we will spell it out in detail here.
          Suppose a person has one share of Reliance and buys a put option at ` 300 which can be exercised
          T  years  in  the  future.  In  this  case,  the  person  faces  no  future  downside  risk  below
          ` 300, since the put option gives him the right to sell Reliance at ` 300. Suppose, in addition, the
          person sells a call option on Reliance at ` 300. In this case, if the price goes above ` 300, the call
          holder will exercise the call option and take away the share at ` 300. The sale of the call eliminates
          upside risk above ` 300.

          Hence, the following portfolio {one share, plus a put option at ` 300, minus a call option at ` 300}
          risklessly obtains ` 300 on date T. This payoff is identical to a simple bond which yields ` 300 on
          date T.

                                                                                     T
          Suppose the interest rate in the economy is r, then this bond has the present price 300/(1 + r) .
          This is a situation to which the law of one price applies: we have two portfolios which yield the
          identical payoff:
                        T
          1.   300 /(1 + r)  invested in a simple bond, which turns into ` 300 on date T for sure, and
          2.   A portfolio formed of S + P – C, which turns into ` 300 on date T for sure.
          By the law of one price, if two portfolios yield the identical payoffs then they must cost the same.
                                                 T
          Hence we get the formula : S + P – C = X/ (1 + r)  , where S is the spot price, P is the put price, C
          is the call price, X is the exercise price and T is the time to expiration.
          If prices in any economy ever violate this formula, then riskless profits can be obtained by a
          suitable combination of puts, calls and shares. In summary, put-call parity links up the price of
          a call and the price of a put. If one is known, then we can infer the other.
          The put-call parity states that the difference in price between a call-option and a put-option with
          the same terms should equal the price of the underlying asset less the present discounted value
          of the exercise price. A put and call option written on the same stock with the same exercise price
          and maturity date must sustain, if there are to be no riskless arbitrage opportunities. This
          condition is known as the 'put-call parity' (Kester and Backstrand, 1995). This relationship can be
          expressed as follows:

               V  – V  = P  – X
                c   p   a
          where,
               V  = the price of a call option,
                c
               V  = the price of a put option,
                p





                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   107
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117