Page 70 - DLIS103_LIBRARY_CLASSIFICATION_AND_CATALOGUING_THEORY
P. 70

Unit 10: Current Trends in Standardization


            in other catalogue codes. Had the CCC been revised during the 1970s replacing rules for description  Notes
            with the ISBDs and updating the other rules properly it would have been a great boon to modern
            cataloguing.
               (i) Literature Review: ISBD attempts to cover a range of bibliographic activities and includes
                  elements common to one or more (ISBD (G) 1992). National bibliographic agencies create
                  records for publications issued in each country, using ISBD as a guide.



              Did u know? ISBD is used to describe complete or perfect copies of material (ISBD for Older
                         Monographic Publications, 2004).
                  Other cataloguing agencies have more choice in description, although they are still bound
                  by ISBD’s prescribed order and punctuation. Factors such as name headings, subject infor-
                  mation, and uniform titles, and so on, are not included in ISBD, but may be included in
                  cataloguing codes (Hargler, 1991).
              (ii) The Problem: A continuing information explosion has driven some authors to patronize
                  these publishers who do not meet the standards of ISBD. Some Nigerian publishes do not
                  observe basic ISBD requirements, and the title pages of many publications are either
                  missing or are lack basic information.

            (b) Common Communication Format  (CCF)

            The Unesco Common Communication Format (CCF) is described in the context of other exchange
            formats. A definition is given of ‘exchange format’, and the CCF is compared against this definition.
            The history of its development is outlined and its major technical features are summarized. Examples
            are given of the ways in which it is being used and is likely to be used in the future, and a number
            of implementation manuals are mentioned which have been developed to assist in its use.

            (c) MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC)

            This document provides references to the use of SGML / XML in bibliographic data management
            based upon MARC formats. It also has references some generalized approaches to markup-based
            bibliographic database management and citation generation.
            MARC refers to a suite of related standards (USMARC, Can/MARC, Inter MARC, UKMARC, CCF, etc.)
            used for bibliographic control within the library science and digital libraries’ communities. ‘MARC’ is
            based upon ISO 2709:1996, Format for Information Exchange (INEX). ‘USMARC’ is based on ANSI
            Z39.2, American National Standard for Bibliographic Information Interchange. Conversion from MARC
            to SGML/XML (and the reverse) has been addressed in several different efforts.




              Notes “The MARC formats are standards for the representation and communication of
              bibliographic and related information in machine-readable form.
            A USMARC record involves three elements: the record structure, the content designation, and the
            data content of the record. A USMARC format is a set of codes and content designators defined for
            encoding machine-readable records. The Formats are five types of data: bibliographic, holdings,
            authority, classification, and community information.



              Task Do you think database searching and budget restraints are the most significant trends
              in the public library reference work. Justify your answer.



                                  LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                               65
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75