Page 156 - DLIS001_FOUNDATION_OF_LIBRARY_AND_INFORMATION_SCIENCE
P. 156

Unit 8: Special Libraries




                                                                                                Notes
             own material. On the contrary, Scott (1959, P 113) found that 59% of the respondents
             claimed to do most of their journal reading at home followed by 27% at place of work, 2%
             during journey on train, 3% in a library, 1% in other places and 2% of the respondents did
             no reading of technical journals. In a study of in-house use of library documents and seat
             occupancy, the space technologists were found to visit the library more during departmental
             reviews for promotion. The distribution of user-visit data over a typical day was bimodal,
             roughly symmetric and the same was cyclical over a typical week with maximum during
             mid of a working week (Sridhar, 1982). Like use of library documents, the reservations
             made by the space technologists for lent out documents followed skewed distribution and
             year of acquisition of a document had a stronger effect on its chances of getting more
             reservations than year of publication (Sridhar, 1983). In another study, it was found that
             less than one-fourth of the space technologists have had participated in collection
             development of the library (Sridhar, 1983). Yet another case study showed non-use of
             classified catalogue, heavy use of subject catalogue and a roughly symmetric bio-modal
             distribution of card catalogue consultation over a typical day by the space technologists.
             Further, card catalogues are consulted most of the time either to locate a document on the
             shelf or to interact with the circulation counter than for literature search (Sridhar, 1986).
             There are not many worth citing studies in user-research about specific aspects of
             user-behaviour within library as far as scientists, engineers, technologists and technicians
             are concerned Studies are that of academic or public library users. Apart from science
             library at MIT mentioned above, Pings and Anderson’s (1965) study of user movement/
             flow pattern, the study made by the University of Cambridge Library Management
             Research Unit (1975) about seat occupancy, and Campbell and Schlechter’s (1979) study of
             library design influences on user-behaviour are some of the studies in this direction.

             As an extension of a previous study (Sridhar, 1982), a limited sample of the space
             technologists drawn from the population have been observed for their broad behaviour
             regarding physical interactions with their ‘primary library’. The observations relate to
             the patterns of library visits, library traffic/user movement, use of various services and
             facilities (within the library) and length of stay of the users in the library. The ‘Primary
             library’ in this study is ISAC Library and it is housed in a centrally located area as part of
             the main building of the organisation on a plinth area of about 10,000 sq. ft. Approximately
             one-fourth of the plinth area consists of mezzanine floor. The building was neither designed
             for the library nor is it adequate to house the library at the time of study.
             Based on the data recorded on 24 randomly chosen days during October 1984 and January
             1985, it was found that on an average 200 users visit the library (on a working day), of which
             55 visited the mezzanine floor of the library where current journals, bound volumes of
             journals, standards, reprints and product catalogues are housed. It may be noted that sampling
             is done for selection of days and user visit data was collected for the entire selected day.
             It may also be noted that, by and large, the users who have made more use of library
             documents also tend to make more interactions with the library and vice versa. Those who
             made more use of one type of document or more interactions of one type with the library
             tend to make more use of other types of documents or more interactions of other types.
             It is the nonusers of the library who have remained nonusers of almost all the services and
             facilities of the library tending eventually to become isolated group of nonusers. The
             library-use index of the IST has correlated moderately and positively (r=0.53, df = 393,
             p<0.05) with their library-interaction index. Just like every library will have a defined set
             of primary members, every user will have a primary library on which he depends
             substantially for his information requirements and the primary library enables him to
             enter the network or system of libraries.

                                                                               Contd....


                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   151
   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161