Page 158 - DLIS001_FOUNDATION_OF_LIBRARY_AND_INFORMATION_SCIENCE
P. 158

Unit 8: Special Libraries




                                                                                                Notes
             One hundred and eighty minutes was the maximum length of stay by one user, followed
             by 120 minutes each by two users. The average length of stay of the users based on mean
             of the ranges is 58 minutes. About 58% of the respondents spent 5-30 minutes per visit in
             the library in Raitt’s (1984, p 242) study. The number of users and their length of stay in the
             library based on mean of the ranges are given in Table 2. The data in Table 2 also indicates
             that only 7 out of 30 users stayed beyond an hour in the library.

                   Table 2: Number of Users Vs Mean Length of Stay of Users in the Library

                   Time in minutes        No. of Users    N(t) (No. of users staying longer
                         (t)                  (N)               than t minutes)
                         30                   9                      30
                         45                   8                      21
                         60                   6                      13
                         75                   2                      7
                         90                   2                      5
                        120                   2                      3
                        180                   1                      1
                        Total                 30                     30

             In Raitt’s study (1984, p 242), 15% of his respondents spent more than one hour in the
             library. When this data was plotted on graph, i.e., t, the time in minutes plotted against
             N(t) the number of users staying longer than t minutes; it resulted in a reverse shaped
             curve (Bush, et. al., 1956).
             One interesting feature is that the average time spent by the users in journals section is
             much longer than that spent in books and reports sections despite the fact that fewer users
             have used journals than books. This partly explains the quantitative under-usage of journals
             by the Indian Space Technologists. It may be noted (*) that the total number of users in
             Table 3 is shown as 45 (i.e. 15 in excess of samples), as they were common users of both
             ground floor as well as mezzanine floor service areas during a visit. In other words,
             almost 50% of those who used books also used journals when they visited the library.
                         Table 3: Frequency Distribution of Length of Stay of Users


                                                    No. of Users
                Time in minutes   Ground Floor   Mezzanine Floor        Total
                     <20              4                3                 7
                     20-30            8                0                 8
                     30-40            7                5                 12
                     >40              5               13                 18
                     Total           24               21                 45*

             Key: *, Total does not tally to 30 due to 15 users using both the ground floor and the mezzanine floor.
             From even a cursory glance at the literature on user-research, it appears that there is a total
             lack of sound studies of user-interactions with libraries in general and interactions of
             scientists, engineers, technologists and technicians in particular. A real-time study of
                                                                               Contd....



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   153
   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163