Page 108 - DLIS003_LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT
P. 108

Unit 6: Library Finance




          6.1.2  Financial Management in Service-oriented and Not-for-profit                    Notes
                 Organizations

          Information centres are paternalistic, service-oriented and not-for-profit organizations. Financial
          management in such organizations is more complex and important than in profit-oriented
          organizations. Money management in service-oriented and not-for-profit organizations (NFP)
          involves systematic planning, getting funds, judicious spending and meticulous accounting of
          funds.
          There are certain difficulties in the financial management of service-oriented and not-for profit
          organizations. The problem becomes acute if the budgets of such institutions are not planned as
          part of the planning of the parent body and if they worry more about accounting than planning.
          Among the important characteristics of service-oriented and not-for-profit organizations are
          these are normally labour intensive compared to profit-oriented organization, will not have
          any inventory of services, will have dominance of professionals and the quality of service
          cannot be inspected and measured in advance i.e., before rendering the service.
          Further, there appears to be lack of a profit measure in such institutions and the absence of a
          profit motive treasure is quite typical to service-oriented and not-for-profit organizations. Profit-
          oriented organizations measure their output by the amount of revenue earned based on prices
          charged for goods and services sold. For individual profit centres, revenue is measured by
          transfer prices. Service-oriented and not-for-profit organizations either should devise similar
          monetary measures of output or rely on non-monetary measures. By and large, the output
          measurement is a problem in service and NFP institutions.
          Generally, there is no single criterion to measure the success of such organizations. Multiple
          objectives, lack of a relationship between costs and benefits and difficulties in measuring
          performance and comparing performance of different units of the same organization are some
          peculiarities of such organizations.
          There appears to be no direct relationship between the costs and benefits in service organizations.
          There is a clear difficulty in measuring the performance of service-oriented and not-for-profit
          organizations. Further, due to dissimilar functions, the organizational units cannot be compared
          in service-oriented and not-for-profit organizations.
          Market forces play a less significant role in service-oriented and not-for-profit organizations.
          Due to lack of shareholders, there appear to be differences in ownership and power. Consequently,
          there is a tendency for service-oriented and not-for-profit organizations to be political
          organizations.
          Historically the cost accounting and other control techniques were developed for manufacturing
          (i.e., profit-oriented) companies and hence they have less applicability to service-oriented and
          not-for-profit organizations. Further, inadequate management controls have become a tradition
          in such institutions. Lastly, most service organizations are relatively small and operate at a
          single location.
          Information centres have not given adequate attention to output measurement. In the absence of
          a monetary output measure, certain non-monetary measures could be employed by service and
          NFP organizations. The non-monetary output measures could be classified in many ways. They
          can be subjective or objective, discrete or scalar, quantitative or qualitative. Important
          non-monetary output measures are:

          1.   Results measures
          2.   Process measures
          3.   Social indicators
          4.   Inputs as proxy output measures




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   103
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113