Page 131 - DLIS402_INFORMATION_ANALYSIS_AND_REPACKAGING
P. 131

Information Analysis and Repackaging



                   Notes         There has also been a realisation that a deliberately stated query (which can be distinguished from
                                 an information need or assertion of relevance) may be a methodological requirement for controlled
                                 experiment, but is not intrinsic to the information seeking situation and that it is possible to search
                                 without verbalising an information need.
                                 The classic information retrieval paradigm, and the concepts and measures associated with it, could
                                 be preserved but only at the cost of increasing its distance from more realistic information seeking
                                 situations. It may be that not only are the classical concepts and measures both becoming and being
                                 recognised as increasingly artificial but that the founding assumption-that a system should deliver
                                 all (and only all) the relevant records should be re-examined. What is required, then, is not
                                 questioning of concepts with the paradigm but of its founding assumption, turning what has been
                                 received as a given into an object of enquiry.
                                 To some extent, this has begun to occur within information retrieval research. The subtlety and
                                 complexity of information retrieval has been recognised, Swanson 1988. Most specifically, the
                                 principle of exploratory capability, the ability to explore and make discriminations between
                                 representations of objects, has been suggested as the fundamental design principle for information
                                 retrieval systems, Ellis 1984; 1996.
                                 On a subjective level, this can be supported by introspection: that what I desire from information
                                 retrieval systems is not a possibly mysterious transformation of a query into a set of records, but a
                                 means of enlarging my capacity for informed choice between the representations of objects within
                                 the given universe of discourse. Such an enhanced capacity for informed choice broadly corresponds
                                 to exploratory capability. It could also be regarded as analogous to a sense of cognitive control over,
                                 or ability to discriminate between, representations of objects.
                                 One example (which may be fictional in a double sense) can be given of the need for enhanced
                                 discriminatory power. At one point in time, a researcher might wish to distinguish the private
                                 individual, Samuel Langhorne Clemens, from the author, Mark Twain, (perhaps out of interest in
                                 his copyright disputes or in his brother’s, Orion Clemens, activities as Secretary to Nevada Territory).
                                 What would be valuable for this purpose would be a system which did not conflate these two
                                 distinguishable aspects of the individual but enabled them to be differentiated. At a later point in
                                 time, the same researcher might be interested in information on Mark Twain and Samuel Clemens
                                 considered as single entity. An information retrieval system should then be able to differentiate and
                                 to link together the occurrences of these different names, as required.
                                 In conclusion, the assumption that it is desirable to obtain all, and possibly only all, the records
                                 relevant to a given query can be rejected in favour of the alternative principle of exploratory capability
                                 or enhanced capacity for informed choice. Introspection supported the value of exploratory
                                 capability. Its appeal as an alternative to the established information retrieval paradigm could be
                                 strengthened if it could be found, even if only implicitly or in analogous forms, in other,
                                 independently developed, discourses.

                                 Principle of Indexing and Classification

                                 An acknowledged principle of indexing and classification is that the value of a term is its
                                 discriminatory power. By discriminatory power is understood the ability to partition and select
                                 from the objects represented within the given universe of discourse. What particular terms or methods
                                 of classification are appropriate will vary with the area of discourse and the focus of interest: most
                                 obviously, a factor which differentiates one set of objects from another will not serve to discriminate
                                 within either set of objects. Discriminatory power is again analogous to exploratory capability, or,
                                 more accurately, a critical factor in enabling progressive and controlled exploration.








            126                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136