Page 145 - DCOM102_DMGT101_PRINCIPLES_AND_PRACTICES_OF_MANAGEMENT
P. 145

Unit 8: Span of Management




          organisation. The structure would tend  to be  flat and  wide. Presumably  the possibility  of  Notes
          communication blockages would be minimized because more people report directly to the top
          executive. If the span is small, the structure would be narrow and deep. There would be more
          levels in the organisation. More people will have to communicate to the top manager through
          intervening layer of executives.  The possibility of communication blockages and  distortions
          would increase.


                 Example: If there are 256 persons in an organisation and all are reporting to one executive,
          there will be one level  of management. If it is thought  that only four subordinates should
          directly report to the chief executive, then the number of management levels will increase to
          two as four executives directly report to the top executive and each executive controls 64 persons
          as shown in Figure 8.1. This structure is flat as the span of control is very large at the lowest level
          and there are only two layers of management. If it is thought that an executive can manage only
          4 subordinates effectively, the number of managerial levels will increase to four as shown in
          Figure 8.2. This will make the organisation structure look like a tall pyramid.

          Wide Span of supervision:  When the span of supervision is wider, the number of executives
          needed to supervise the workers will be less. This will make the organisation structure wide.
          Such a structure would be less expensive because of less overhead costs of supervision. Since the
          number of  levels is less, there  will be  better communication  between  the  worker and the
          management and better coordination. However, the quality of performance is likely to deteriorate
          because one executive cannot effectively supervise a large number of subordinates. He will not
          be able to devote sufficient time in directing each and every subordinate.
                          Figure  8.1 Flat  Structure  (Span  of  Control  = 64  Workers)

                                                                  Chief Executive = 1




                                                                II Level Executives = 4




                64 W       64 W          64 W         64 W            Workers = 256


                          Figure  8.2: Tall  Structure (Span  of Control  = 4  Workers)

                                                                     Chief Executive = 1



                                                                  II Level Executives = 4



                                                                 III Level Executives = 16



                                                                 IV Level Executives = 64


                 4 W                                                     Workers = 256




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   137
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150