Page 96 - DHIS204_DHIS205_INDIAN_FREEDOM_STRUGGLE_HINDI
P. 96

Unit 8: Peasant Movements


          Meanwhile, the Congress at Calcutta had chosen the path of non-cooperation and many nationalists  Notes
          of U.P. had committed themselves to the new political path. But there were others, including
          Madan Mohan Malaviya, who preferred to stick to constitutional agitation. These differences were
          reflected in the U.P. Kisan Sabha as well, and soon the Non-cooperators set up an alternative Oudh
          Kisan Sabha at Pratapgarh on 17 October 1920. This new body succeeded in integrating under its
          banner all the grassroots kisan sabhas that had emerged in the districts of Avadh in the past few
          months; through the efforts of Misra, Jawaharlal Nehru, Mata Badal Pande, Baba Ramchandra,
          Deo Narayan Pande and Kedar Nath, the new organization-brought under its wing, by the end of
          October, over 330 kisan sabhas. The Oudh Kisan Sabha asked the kisans to refuse to till bedakhli land,
          not to offer hari and begar (forms of unpaid labour), to boycott those who did not accept these
          conditions and to solve their disputes through panchayats. The first big show of strength of the
          Sabha was the rally held at Ayodhya, near Fyzabad town, on 20 and 21 December which was
          attended by roughly 100,000 peasants. At this rally, Baba Ramchandra turned up bound in ropes
          to symbolize the oppression of the kisans. A marked feature of the Kisan Sabha movement was that
          kisans belonging to the high as well as the low castes were to be found in its ranks.
          In January 1921, however, the nature of the peasant activity underwent a marked change. The
          centres of activity were primarily the districts of Rae Bareli, Fyzabad and, to a lesser extent,
          Sultanpur. The pattern of activity was the looting of bazaars, houses, granaries, and clashes with
          the police. A series of incidents, small and big, but similar in character, occurred. Some, such as
          the ones at Munshiganj and Karhaiya Bazaar in Rae Bareli, were sparked off by the arrests or
          rumours of arrest of leaders. The lead was often taken not by recognized Kisan Sabha activists, but
          by local figures—sadhus, holy men, and disinherited ex-proprietors.
          The Government, however, had little difficulty in suppressing these outbreaks of violence. Crowds
          were fired upon and dispersed, leaders and activists arrested, cases launched and, except for a
          couple of incidents in February and March, the movement was over by the end of January itself.
          In March, the Seditious Meetings Act was brought in to cover the affected districts and all political
          activity came to a standstill. Nationalists continued to defend the cases of the tenants in the courts,
          but could do little else. The Government, meanwhile, pushed through the Oudh Rent (Amendment)
          Act, and though it brought little relief to the tenants, it helped to rouse hopes and in its own way
          assisted in the decline of the movement.
          Towards the end of the year, peasant discontent surfaced again in Avadh, but this time the centres
          were the districts of Hardoi, Bahraich, and Sitapur in the northern part of the province.
          The main grievances here related to the extraction of a rent that was generally fifty per cent higher
          than the recorded rent, the oppression of thekedars to whom the work of rent-collection was farmed
          out and the practice of share-rents.
          The Eka meetings were marked by a religious ritual in which a hole that represented the river
          Ganges was dug in the ground and filled with water, a priest was brought in to preside and the
          assembled peasants vowed that they would pay only the recorded rent but pay it on time, would
          not leave when ejected, would refuse to do forced labour, would give no help to criminals and
          abide by the panchayat decisions.
          The Eka Movement, however, soon developed its own grass-roots leadership in the form of Madari
          Pasi and other low-caste leaders who were not particularly inclined to accept the discipline of
          non-violence that the Congress and Khilafat leaders urged. As a result, the movement’s contact
          with the nationalists diminished and it went its own way. However, unlike the earlier Kisan Sabha
          movement that was based almost solely on tenants, the Eka Movement included in its ranks many
          small zamindars who found themselves disenchanted with the Government because of its heavy
          land revenue demand. By March 1922, however, severe repression on the part of the authorities
          succeeded in bringing the Eka Movement to its end.




                       The initial thrust here was provided by Congress and Khilafat leaders and the
                       movement grew under the name of the Eka or unity movement.




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                        91
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101