Page 136 - DMGT207_MANAGEMENT_OF_FINANCES
P. 136

Unit 6: Capital Budgeting




          Advantages                                                                            Notes

          1.   It possesses the advantages, which are offered by the NPV criterion such as it considers
               time value of money, and takes into account the total cash inflows and outflows.
          2.   IRR is easier to understand. Business executives and non-technical people understand the
               concept of IRR much more readily that they understand the concepts of NPV.
          3.   It does not use the concept of the required cost of return (or the cost of capital). It itself
               provides a rate of return which is indicative of the profitability of the proposal. The cost of
               capital enters the calculation, later on.

          4.   It is consistent with the overall objective of maximizing shareholders wealth since the
               acceptance or otherwise of a project is based on comparison of the IRR with the required
               rate of return.

          Limitations

          1.   It involves tedious calculations.
          2.   It produces multiple rates, which can be confusing.
          3.   In evaluating mutually exclusive proposals, the project with the highest IRR would be
               picked up to the exclusion of all others. However, in practice, it may not turn out to be one
               that is the most profitable and consistent with the objectives of the firm i.e., maximization
               of the wealth of the shareholders.
          4.   Under IRR method, it is assumed that, all intermediate cash flows are reinvested at the IRR
               rate. It is not logical to think that the same firm has the ability to reinvest, the cash flows
               at different rates. In order to have correct and reliable results it is obvious, therefore, that
               they should be based on realistic estimates of the interest rate at which the income will be
               reinvested.

          5.   The IRR rule requires comparing the projects IRR with the opportunity cost of capital. But,
               sometimes, there is an opportunity cost of capital for 1 year cash flows, a different cost of
               capital for 2-year cash flows and so on. In these cases, there is no simple yardstick for
               evaluating the IRR of a project.

          Self Assessment


          Fill in the blanks:
          5.   Under Net Present Value (NPV) method, all cash inflows and outflow are discounted at a
               ………………… acceptable rate of return, usually the firm's cost of capital.

          6.   ………………… is the ratio of the present value of cash inflows to the present value of the
               cash outflows.
          7.   ………………… is the interest rate that discounts an investment's future cash flows to the
               present so that the present value of cash inflows exactly equals the present value of the
               cash outflows.


          6.4 Comparison – NPV and IRR Methods

          Similarities:  In  respect of  conventional and independent projects, the  two  methods give a
          concurrent acceptance-reject decision. In case of conventional investment  cash outflows are




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   131
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141