Page 152 - DPOL201_WESTERN_POLITICAL_THOUGHT_ENGLISH
P. 152

Western Political Thought


                    Notes          Self-Assessment
                                   Choose the correct option:
                                   1. Jean Jacques Rousseau was the greatest thinker that the ............... produced.
                                       (i) English       (ii) Russian       (iii) French        (iv) None of these.
                                   2. Rousseau was born on June 28, 1712 in the city of ...............
                                       (i) Germany       (ii) France        (iii) Geneva        (iv) None of these.
                                   3. Le Devin du village (The Village Soothsayer) was performed for the first time in Paris on
                                      March 1, ............... .
                                       (i) 1754          (ii) 1753          (iii) 1760          (iv) 1751
                                   4. In the ............... Rousseau distinguished between the state of nature and civil society.
                                       (i) Emile         (ii) Discourses    (iii) Politics      (iv) None of these.

                                   8.13 Summary

                                        Rousseau’s theory, like Marx’s, was international in character. There was a conception of the
                                        human family and an international federation as the end of his political ideal. He also projected
                                        the body politic as a moral being which would preserve the welfare of the whole as well as
                                        its constituent parts. It was the source of all laws, and determined the relationships between
                                        its members. It would be an end in itself and also a means to an end. Rousseau was also seen
                                        as the spiritual father of the French Revolution of 1789. Burke referred to him as “the insane
                                        Socrates of the National Assembly”. Many of the ideas of Rousseau were put into practice
                                        during the “later and more terrible phases of the Revolution”.
                                        Rousseau provided an excellent analysis of human nature in politics. He refused to look at
                                        the individual as a supernatural entity. He rejected the idea of natural sociability that the
                                        ancients propounded, and also the notion of radical selfishness and egoism that the moderns
                                        stressed on. He supported the idea of transformation of human nature from a narrow self-
                                        seeking being into a public-spirited person. He took the individual as he was, “partly rational,
                                        partly emotional, influenced by considerations of utility, but even more swayed by passions
                                        and prejudices, at bottom moral and virtuous, but easily corrupted by bad institutions, and
                                        in most cases, dependent for the maintenance of his virtue of good ones. He brought to the
                                        fore the importance of ethics in politics as he was not interested merely in happiness or
                                        utility” (Cassirer 1946: 70). In the last resort, the value of Rousseau’s political thought, “was
                                        not completely individualist, while at the same time it was equally not based on any
                                        glorification of society as distinct from the individuals of which it was composed” (Cobban
                                        1964: 168). He had the most rigorous and revolutionary theory of sovereignty conceived as
                                        omnipotent and omnipresent. The state represented the pinnacle of human existence, the
                                        source of all morality, freedom and community. Its purpose was not merely to resolve conflicts,
                                        but to be a means to liberate the individual from the uncertainties and hypocrisies of traditional
                                        society. The state was a redeemer of the individual, enabling the latter to escape the “torments,
                                        insecurities and dissensions of ordinary society” (Nisbet 1990: 125-126, 138). “Sovereignty,
                                        for Rousseau, is not a mere legal thing; it is the sum total of all virtues and even freedoms”
                                        (Nisbet ibid: 110).
                                        The individual and the state were two themes in Rousseau’s theory. Both were simultaneously
                                        sovereign. Both were needed to realize a just social and political order. To see Rousseau as an
                                        individualist or a champion of state absolutism would be to do injustice to the complex
                                        kaleidoscopic nature of his political philosophy. What emerged was a radical individualism
                                        on the one hand, and tmcompromising authoritarianism on the other. His individualism was
                                        not in the sense of an immunity from the state, but one that was coextensive of the state.


          146                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157