Page 81 - DPOL202_COMPARATIVE_POLITICS_AND_GOVERNMENT_ENGLISH
P. 81

Comparative Politics and Government


                    Notes          following constitutional procedures in their actions. In other political cultures, the leaders may
                                   base their claim to legitimacy on their special grace, wisdom, or ideology, which they claim will
                                   transform citizens’ lives for the better, even though the government does not respond to specific
                                   demands or follow prescribed procedures.
                                   Whether legitimacy is based on tradition, ideology, citizen participation, or specific policies, the
                                   basis of legitimacy defines the fundamental understanding between citizens and political authorities.
                                   Citizens obey the laws—and in return the government meets the obligations set by the terms of its
                                   legitimacy. As long as the government meets its obligations, the public is supposed to comply, be
                                   supportive, and act appropriately. If legitimacy is violated—the line of succession is broken, the
                                   constitution is subverted, or the ruling ideology is ignored—then the government may expect
                                   resistance and perhaps rebellion.
                                   In systems with low legitimacy or where the claimed bases for legitimacy are not accepted, people
                                   often resort to violence to solve political disagreement. Legitimacy may be undermined where the
                                   public disputes boundaries of the political, system (as in Northern Ireland or East Timor) rejects
                                   the current arrangements for recruiting leaders and making policies (as when Filipinos took to the
                                   streets and demanded the ouster of Ferdinand Marcos and free elections) or loses confidence that
                                   the leaders are fulfilling their part of the political bargain in making the right kinds of laws or
                                   following the right procedures (as when Indonesians protested deteriorating of living conditions
                                   under Sukarno).
                                   The Soviet Union disintegrated in the early 1990s because all three kinds of legitimacy problems
                                   appeared. After Communist ideology failed as a legitimizing force, there was no basis for a national
                                   political community in the absence of common language or ethnicity. Similarly, the general loss of
                                   confidence in the Communist Party as the dominating political structure led many people to call
                                   for new arrangements. Finally, shortages of food and consumer goods caused people to lose faith
                                   in the government’s short-term economic and political policies. Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev
                                   failed in his efforts to deal with all three problems at the same time.
                                   Another systemic orientation involves regime norms. In the early twentieth century a variety of
                                   political systems divided the world. Fascism was on the rise in Europe, communism was establishing
                                   itself in the Soviet Union, colonial administrations governed large parts of the world, monarchical
                                   or authoritarian governments ruled other parts of the world, and Western Europe and North
                                   America strained to maintain democracy in this sea of conflicting currents.
                                   Today, many of these forms of governance are no longer widely accepted. Communism still has
                                   strong holds in China and Cuba, but it has lost its image as a progressive force for global change.
                                   Some nations of the world still accept autocratic or religiously based systems of government.
                                   However, most of the people in the world today seem to favor democratic principles even if they
                                   differ in how those principles should be applied.




                                                The global wave of democratization in the 1990s has, raised democratic principles
                                                to a position of prominence.


                                   The Process Level
                                   The second level of the political culture involves what the public expects of the political process.
                                   If you are English or Nigerian, what do you think about the institutions of your political system
                                   and what is expected of you as a citizen?
                                   Broadly speaking, three different patterns describe the citizens’ role in the political process.
                                   Participants are involved as actual or potential participants in the political process. They are
                                   informed about politics and make demands on the polity, granting their support to political
                                   leaders based on performance. Subjects passively obey government officials and the law, but they
                                   do not vote or actively involve themselves in politics. Parochials are hardly aware of government


          76                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86