Page 254 - DSOC201_SOCIAL_STRUCTURE_AND_SOCIAL_CHANGE_ENGLISH
P. 254

Unit 12: Processes of Change


          spread of Sanskritization among the low castes. It is the separation of ritual acts from the accompanying  Notes
          mantras (citations) which facilitated the spread of Brahmanical rituals among all Hindu castes, including
          the untouchables. The restrictions imposed by the Brahmins on the non-twice-born castes banned
          only the chanting of mantras from the Vedas. Thus, the low caste people could adopt the social practices
          of the Brahmins. This made Sanskritization feasible.
          The political institution of parliamentary democracy has also contributed to the increased
          Sanskritization, according to Srinivas (1985: 49). Prohibition, a sanskritic value, has been mentioned
          in the Constitution of India. Some states have introduced it wholly or partially.
          12.2 Westernization

          Westernization refers to “the changes in technology, institutions, ideology and values of a non-western
          society as a result of cultural contact with the western society for a long period “(Srinivas, 1962: 55).
          Giving an example of Indian society, the technological changes, establishment of educational
          institutions, rise of nationalism and new political culture, etc. may all be described as the bye-products
          of westernization or of the British rule of two hundred years in India. Thus, by Westernization,
          Srinivas primarily meant the British impact.
          The important features of Westernization are: (1) Emphasis on technology and rationalism. (2) This
          process (of Westernization) is not retarded by the process of Sanskritization, but to some extent it is
          accelerated by it. Srinivas had earlier maintained that Sanskritization is a prelude to Westernization.
          However, later on, he changed his view and maintained that it is not necessary for Sanskritization
          occurring prior to Westernization (1985: 60). But the two processes are linked with each other. It may
          not be possible to understand one without the other. Harold Gould has also said that for Brahmins
          and other higher castes, sanskritizing is an attempt to maintain the distance between them and the
          lower castes who are sanskritizing. Thus, the Brahmins are, in a sense, running away from the lower
          groups who are trying to catch up with them.
          The form and pace of Westernization of India varied from region to region and from one section of
          population to another (Srinivas, 1985: 51). For instance, one group of people became westernized in
          their dress, diet, manners, speech, sports and in the gadgets they used while another absorbed western
          science, knowledge and literature, remaining relatively free from Westernization in externals For
          example, Brahmins accepted the dress and appearance (tuff giving way to cropped hair), sending
          their children to westernized schools, using gadgets like radio, car, etc., but they did not accept the
          British diet, dancing, hunting, and freedom from pollution. This distinction is, however, only of
          relative emphasis. It is not a clear-cut distinction.
          Srinivas prefers the term ‘Westernization’ to ‘Modernization’ (wheras Daniel Lerner, Harold Gould,
          Milton Singer, and Yogendra Singh prefer ‘Modernization’ in place of ‘Westernization’. He considers
          the later term as subjective and the former term as more objective (Seminar, 88, 1986: 2). The called
          ‘rationality of goals’ in modernization could not be taken for granted because human goals are based
          on value preferences. As such, rationality could only be predicted of the means and not of the ends of
          social action.
          Scholars’ Support to the Concepts
          Scholars like Bernard Cohn and Milton Singer have supported the validity of the concept of
          Sanskritization on the basis of their empirical studies. Cohn had studied a village in eastern Uttar
          Pradesh in 1950s. This village consisted of two main castes—a dominant caste of Thakurs and a large
          untouchable caste of Chamars. The landless Chamars had tended to become sanskritized by adopting
          their landlord’s (Thakur’s) rituals at times of marriage and birth through education obtained in the
          local schools and through a rise in their income. On the other hand, many Thakurs had migrated to
          cities and became industrial workers, clerks and teachers, taking on in their dress and manner and in
          their religious outlook, what may be called a more westernized form of Hinduism. Thus, while upper
          caste was westernizing its style of life and religious beliefs, the lower caste was sanskritizing and
          assuming more traditional forms of ritual, practice and belief.



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       249
   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259