Page 181 - DSOC202_SOCIAL_STRATIFICATION_ENGLISH
P. 181

Social  Stratification


                   Notes          The sexual division explained by the Marxist thought has less to do with the actual patterns of
                                  social interaction or social relationship. From this perspective arose an important question of
                                  whether or not female domestic has always had difficulties in formulating a coherent theory of
                                  action which could not relate the analysis of objective class position and of system contradictions
                                  of class formation.
                                  However, a proper stratification analysis on patriarchy has been ignored which according to
                                  Mann (1986) created a crisis in stratification theory.
                                  In almost all cultures, patriarchy legitimizes the unequal access of men and women to resources,
                                  opportunities and rewards. Patriarchy and its institutions reinforce status inequality between men
                                  and women. According to Sylvia Walby (1994), in patriarchy both differential distribution of
                                  power and mechanism of production are included.
                                  Cross-cultural studies done on sexual division of labour focus on a wide range of women’s
                                  productive activities in society and the status implications of these on women’s status.

                                  9.1 Gender and Stratification

                                  To begin with, males assert the biological inferiority of women even today. Female disorderliness
                                  is brought under control by education, producing modesty and humility, by honest work and the
                                  subordination of the wife to her husband. Married women are deprived of certain forms of
                                  independence, even regarding their dowries and possessions. They are confined to the domestic
                                  sphere. These are the views even today held and practised considerably in most societies. One
                                  hardly finds any description, for example, in a work like The Making of the English Working Class by
                                  E.P. Thompson. His class analysis refers more or less exclusively to men. Even in the recent work
                                  of Eric Hobsbawn one finds reference to experiences of middle-class women. Only very recently,
                                  the idea of “home”/”home making” has come up in a positive sense recognizing contribution of
                                  women. The notice of “housewife” has also emerged that she looks home and children, performing
                                  a very important task, and her husband goes out to earn money, as his duty towards his wife and
                                  children.
                                  Domestic patriarchy has come with the concept of home and home making. Women’s right to
                                  proper recognition of her work at home has been recognized to a great extent all over the world.
                                  Now women go out for work, have their savings, and a control over what they earn. Most men are
                                  not hostile towards women’s work. Despite these very notable changes, the man’s work determines
                                  where the couple lives, and how much of their lives are organized. R.W. Connell calls such a
                                  situation “gender regimes”, and Harriet Bradley gives it the name “gendered work-cultures”.
                                  Some types of work are believed to be “appropriate” for women; and women are debarred from
                                  various types of occupations by informal barriers and restrictions.
                                  Marriage is a gendered and unequal division of labour. In Indian society, husband starts controlling
                                  his wife’s activities, and also starts imposing upon her some of his own activities. Helping the
                                  wife by the husband is considered an inferior task. The modern technology has certainly reduced
                                  the manual load on women, but even then gendered division of work persists. Women, despite
                                  part-time or full-time work; are not able to get equal footing with men because men do not
                                  participate equally in parenthood and domestic labour.
                                  Michael Mann emphatically states that gender divisions are considered as important, but not
                                  really integrated into the core of stratification theory, namely, social class, status and political
                                  power. As mentioned earlier in this chapter, individual, family and household, division of labour
                                  between the sexes, social classes and the nation-states are mediated by each of them. No doubt,
                                  patriarchy has taken a new form due to modern industry, interchangeability of men-women
                                  occupations, equal democratic rights and adult suffrage, and even then “neo-patriarchy” has
                                  emerged due to newly found control mechanisms by men over women in industry, politics and



         176                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186