Page 178 - DSOC202_SOCIAL_STRATIFICATION_ENGLISH
P. 178

Unit 8: Race and Ethnicity


            •   Difference between caste and ethnicity lies in the fact that caste is ascribed by birth. hence, it  Notes
                remains immutable or natural. Ethnicity can also be ascribed, determined by birth in a given
                ethnic community, and its characteristics, including language, religion, styles of life, etc.
            •   “Sons of the Soil” movement, the one presently seen in Maharashtra under the leadership of
                Shiv Sena and its splinter group, conversion, migration, territoriality, dual labour market,
                ethnic division of labour (for example, in Assam and Punjab) have all accelerated ethnicization
                of economic and political interests and aspirations, cleavages and conflicts.
                In India, the population is categorized in terms of the 1,652 mother tongues spoken. Indian
                society is traditionally divided into castes or clans, not ethnicities, and these categories have
                had no official status since Independence in 1947, except for the scheduled castes and tribes
                which remain registered for the purpose of positive discrimination.
            •   Documentation is accumulating indicating that ethnic minorities are retaining their identity
                in contrast to those that have become assimilated into the larger cultural and social systems.
                A considerable proportion of the literature analyzes the nature and problems of inter-group
                relations between a minority and the larger society when the  minority desires acceptance;
                but there is limited resource material available which contributes to an understanding of the
                forces that operate in the relationships between groups that want to retain their identity and
                the majority society.
            •   An ethnic group is a group of people whose members are identified through a common trait.
                This can, but does not have to, include an idea of common heritage, a common culture, a
                shared language or dialect. The group’s ethos or ideology may also stress common ancestry
                and religion, as opposed to an ethnic minority group which refers to race. The process that
                results in the emergence of an ethnicity is called ethnogenesis. Some ethnic groups are
                marked by little more than a common name.
            •   Hostile attitudes towards immigrants should be determined first of all by national
                identification. However, to the extent that majorities cognitively equate the national and
                their ethnic group, ethnic identification should mediate the impact of national identification
                on xenophobia for majorities, but not for minorities. This prediction of a moderated mediation
                should reveal that for majorities, but not for minorities, identification with the superordinate
                category does not directly predict discrimination, but that it is mediated by subgroup
                identification.
            •   In the Anglo-Saxon countries, majority groups themselves are former immigrant groups. In
                the U.S. sample, we distinguished European immigrants (Dominant majority group) from
                African, Caribbean, Arab, Asian and Hispanic Americans who were categorized as Subordinate
                minorities. In Canada, European immigrants (mostly but not exclusively from British descent)
                were classified as the majority group, with the exception of the French Canadians who were
                assigned the subordinate minority status, togather with a small number of more recent
                immigrants.
            •   A series of regression analyses were performed in order to test the second prediction that a
                positive relationship between subgroup and superordinate identities should be observed for
                majorities, and that this relationship should be less positive for minorities. First, within each
                of the nine national contexts, the majority and the minority groups were analysed separately.
                Ethnic identification was the dependent variable, and national identification was entered
                into the regression equation as the main independent variable, along with the control variables
                of age, sex and education level.
            •   An interaction term was computed as the product of subgroup status (minority or majority)
                and national identification. In order to test the null hypothesis that regression coefficients
                were the same across minority and majority groups, the interaction term was entered in the




                                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    173
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183