Page 263 - DSOC202_SOCIAL_STRATIFICATION_ENGLISH
P. 263

Social  Stratification


                   Notes          13.1 Changing Dimensions of Social Stratification

                                  Class
                                  Adam Smith, much before Karl Marx and Max Weber, talked of capitalists and labourers in An
                                  Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. We presume that Marx was considerably
                                  inspired by Smith in formulation of his theory of class, class struggle and class consciousness.
                                  Smith realized the significance of labour and labour power, particularly when he was not under
                                  the command of a landlord or a master. When land became a private property, the landlord
                                  demanded a share of almost all the produce which the labourer could either raise, or collect from
                                  it. His rent made the first deduction from produce of the labour which was employed upon land.
                                  Secondly, the person who tills the ground has wherewithal the ground to maintain himself till he
                                  reaps the harvest. The master maintains his existence by giving advance, and in return he gets
                                  share in the produce of his labour. Thirdly, the produce of almost all other labour is liable to the
                                  like deduction of profit. Much before Marx, Smith voiced for the cause of the labour. He writes:
                                  “In all arts and manufactures the greater part of the workmen stand in need of a master to
                                  advance them the materials of their work, and their wages and maintenance till it be completed.
                                  He shares in the produce of their labour, or in the value which it adds to the materials upon which
                                  it is bestowed; and in this share consists his profit.”
                                  There are not many independent persons combining the roles of a master and a workman. The
                                  masters can combine easily the law and authorities, but workmen cannot do it. Workmen cannot
                                  subsist even for a work, the masters, landlords, master manufacturers or merchants can survive
                                  on their own for a long time. Thus, Smith clearly describes the division of society into classes
                                  (particularly two).
                                  While agreeing with Adam Smith on classes, i.e., capitalists and labourers, Smith’s contemporary
                                  Thomas R. Malthus writes : “In every society that has advanced beyond the savage state, a class
                                  of proprietors, and a class of labourers, must necessarily exist.” By no means the present great
                                  inequality of property is either necessary or useful to society. It must certainly be considered as an
                                  evil and every institution that promotes it is essentially bad and impolitic. Malthus uses much
                                  before Marx, the Marxist language in favour of the poor. He says that the labour is the only
                                  property of the class of labourers. This is the only commodity he has, which he gives in exchange
                                  of the necessities of life.
                                  The Marxian Concept of Class
                                  According to Marx, there are three classes, namely, labourers, capitalists and landowners. There
                                  are also middle and intermediate strata. However, landlords obliterate under the capitalist mode
                                  of production. Only capitalists and wage labourers ultimately constitute the two classes whom
                                  Marx refers as bourgeoisie and proletariat. The bourgeoisie are haves, hence they become a ruling
                                  class. The proletariat are have-nots, hence they become an oppressed class. The relations between
                                  these two classes are determined by their respective positions in the capitalist system of production.
                                  All other relations in the society are determined by these basic relations. Marx terms the basic
                                  relations as base, and the relations built after it are named as superstructure.
                                  A clear exposition of the two classes, namely, bourgeoisie and proletariat is given by Karl Marx
                                  and Frederick Engels in Manifesto of the Communist Party. They write : “The history of all hitherto
                                  existing society is the history of class struggles.” They further write : “By bourgeoisie is meant the
                                  class of modern capitalists, owners of the means of social production and employers of wage
                                  labour. By proletariat, the class of modern wage labourers who, having no means of production of
                                  their own, are reduced to selling their labour power in order to live.” This is how the society has
                                  always been divided mainly into two classes, that is, freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian,
                                  lord and serf, guildmaster and journeyman. These classes are that of the oppressor and the




         258                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268