Page 296 - DSOC202_SOCIAL_STRATIFICATION_ENGLISH
P. 296

Unit 13: Changing Dimensions of Social Stratification


                but hierarchization of differences too creates social inequality. People have tendency to  Notes
                hierarchize their relations, and seek expression and articulation of the same in actual life
                with due legitimacy to perpetuate their entrenched position or to gain access to new avenues
                of status and power. This is how stratification emerges. In this way, social stratification
                incorporates a semblance of differences and hierarchy. The two are found in different
                combinations.
            •   The person who tills the ground has wherewithal the ground to maintain himself till he
                reaps the harvest. The master maintains his existence by giving advance, and in return he
                gets share in the produce of his labour.
            •   There are not many independent persons combining the roles of a master and a workman.
                The masters can combine easily the law and authorities, but workmen cannot do it. Workmen
                cannot subsist even for a work, the masters, landlords, master manufacturers or merchants
                can survive on their own for a long time.
            •   Modern industry has developed the world market. As a result, commerce, navigation and
                communication by land immensely developed. In proportion to such a development, the
                bourgeoisie developed, increased its capital, and pushed into the background every earlier
                class. Marx and Engels thus observe : “We see, therefore, how the modern bourgeoisie is
                itself the product of a long course of development, of a series of revolutions in the modes of
                production and of exchange.”
            •   Marx and Engels write : “But not only has the bourgeoisie forged the weapons that bring
                death to itself, it has also called into existence the new who are to wield those weapons - the
                modern working class - the proletarians”. In proportion to the bourgeoisie, the proletariat -
                a class of labourers - has developed. They are a commodity, like every other article of
                commerce, influenced by the vicissitudes of competition and fluctuation of the market.
            •   The term “class” refers to any group of people that is found in the same class situation. Like
                Marx, for Weber too, class is an economic phenomenon. The people, who are actors in the
                market for material gains, constitute different classes as determined by their role and capacity.
                Market signifies a situation of competition among the actors, namely, buyers and sellers. The
                two are not monoliths, hence, some become privileged and monopolists and others remain
                loosers. Weber observes that property” and “lack of property” are the basic categories of all
                class situations. All this holds true within the area in which true market conditions prevail.
                “Property” and “lack of property” are, therefore, the basic categories of all class situations.
            •   The capitalist class has control over all the three resources. The working class has control
                over none of them. In between the two are  contradictory class locations, in which Wright
                includes white-collar and professional employees. These people are neither capitalists nor
                manual workers, but share some common features with both of them.
            •   Mode of production and class contradictions are essential features of the Marxist approach
                to class, class conflict and class consciousness. The forces of production and production
                relations could be seen even in caste, kinship, family, marriage and even in rituals. Emergence
                of a new bourgeoisie, polarization of peasantry and pauperization of the working class have
                been reported in Indian society.
            •   The primary manifestations in real life can be seen in the practice of connubium, commensality
                and exclusive appropriation of privileged economic opportunities, and also prohibition of
                certain modes of acquisition. There are also certain conventions or traditions attached to a
                social status.
            •   An “occupational group” is also a status group. Generally, it successfully claims social honour
                only by virtue of the special style of life which may be determined by it. The differences
                between classes and status groups frequently overlap. Castes in India are a sort of status




                                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    291
   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301