Page 209 - DMGT206_PRODUCTION_AND_OPERATIONS_MANAGEMENT
P. 209

Production and Operations Management




                    Notes          10.4.3 Single Sourcing Strategy

                                   Single sourcing as a concept evolved from the work carried out by the Boston Consulting Group
                                   (BCG) in the 1960s. The breakthrough came while BCG was working for a major manufacturer
                                   of semiconductors. In a study on the cost of television components BCG found striking differences
                                   in the rate of cost improvement between monochrome parts and color parts. This was difficult
                                   to explain since the same factory, the same labor, the same processes were involved at the same
                                   time. BCG explained the phenomenon through the experience curve.
                                   BCG had earlier observed in many of their studies that producers tend to become increasingly
                                   efficient as they  gain experience in making their product,  and costs usually declined  with
                                   cumulative production. They came up with a hypothesis to explain how an organization with
                                   the  greatest accumulated  volume of  production will  have the  lowest cost  relative to  other
                                   producers in the market. This explained why monochrome parts had progressed down a cost
                                   curve to a larger degree than the color parts. The accumulated experience in monochrome parts
                                   was much greater than in color parts.
                                                           Figure 10.3:  The  Experience  Curve

                                             COST
                                            1.00


                                              .80

                                              .64


                                              .50

                                                         10            20             40            60
                                                                    TOTAL EXPERIENCE

                                   The experience curve is shown as Figure 10.3. According to the experience curve concept, costs of
                                   value added decline approximately 20 to 30 percent in real terms each time accumulated experience
                                   is doubled. If the growth rate is constant, the cost decline continues indefinitely as long as the
                                   growth rate continues. If the growth stops, costs continue to decline, but the rate of decline is cut
                                   in half each time the accumulated experience doubles.
                                   The cost declines identified by the experience curve do not occur automatically. It is assumed
                                   that there is added investment in an amount commensurate with the marginal cost of capital.
                                   Study of the experience curve shows, if high return on investment thresholds is used to limit
                                   capital investment, then costs do not decline as expected.
                                   BCG was able to collect the evidence on a wide variety of semiconductors that were a part of the
                                   original study. Price data supplied by the Electronic Industries Association was compared with
                                   accumulated industry volume. Two distinct patterns emerged:

                                      In one pattern, prices, in current dollars,  remained constant for long periods and  then
                                       began a relatively steep and long continued decline in constant dollars.
                                      In the other pattern, prices, in constant dollars, declined steadily at a constant rate of about
                                       25 percent each time accumulated experience doubled.
                                   This pattern seemed to have applicability across the board. Systematic cost differences arise
                                   between competitors  because some develop more  knowledge about  production than others.




          204                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214