Page 372 - DECO401_MICROECONOMIC_THEORY_ENGLISH
P. 372

Hitesh Jhanji, Lovely Professional University                          Unit-25: The Social Welfare Function



                                                                                                     Notes
                          Unit-25: The Social Welfare Function








               CONTENTS

               Objectives
               Introduction

                25.1    Bergson’s Social Welfare

                25.2   Summary
                25.3   Keywords

                25.4   Review Questions
                25.5   Further Readings



            Objectives
            After studying this unit, students will be able to:

              •  Know about Social welfare function.
              •  Explain the criticism of the social welfare function.
              •  Discuss the equation of social welfare function.
              •  Study the majority rule.



            Introduction
            Prof. Bergson presented the theory of social welfare function for the first time and later Samuelsson,
            Tintner and Arrow have further developed this theory. Their opinion is that without adding value
            judgments, there cannot be any meaningful propositions in welfare economics. The concept of social
            welfare is an attempt to present the idealistic study of welfare economics from scientific view.


            25.1  Bergson’s Social Welfare

            Social welfare function represents those factors on which welfare of society is assumed to be dependent.
            According to the definition given by Bergson, it is “either function of welfare of each individual of
            the community or is the function of goods consumed by each individual of the community and
            services rendered.” In its original form, Bergson has presented social welfare function in an ordinary
            way. “This is that function which relates social welfare and all those possible variables which affect
            welfare of each individual like services and consumption of each individual. It can be assumed that
            “it is each individual’s welfare function which successively depends as his personal evaluation of
            relation between that individual’s own best state and distributed welfare among all members of the




                                             LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   365
   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377