Page 294 - DECO503_INTERNATIONAL_TRADE_AND_FINANCE_ENGLISH
P. 294

International Trade and Finance



                  Notes          By the end of the 1990s, a handful of East European economies including Poland, Hungary, and the
                                 Czech Republic had made successful transitions to the capitalist order. Not surprisingly each of these
                                 countries was geographically close to the EU and had a recent tradition (prior to Soviet occupation in
                                 the late 1940s) of industrial capitalism, including a body of contract and property law. Many of the
                                 other successor states that emerged from the wreckage of the Soviet Union were still faring quite
                                 badly even as the 20th century ended. The largest was Russia, which retained much of the nuclear
                                 weaponry left by the Soviet Union.
                                 Over the course of the 1990s, Russia’s weak government was unable to collect taxes or even to enforce
                                 basic laws; the country was riddled with corruption and organized crime. It is no wonder that measured
                                 output shrank steadily and that inflation was hard to control, so that at the end of the 1990s most
                                 Russians were substantially worse off than under the old Soviet regime. In 1997, the government
                                 managed to stabilize the ruble and reduce inflation with the help of IMF credits, and the economy
                                 even managed to eke out a (barely) positive GDP growth rate that year. However, the government
                                 had slowed inflation by substituting borrowing for seigniorage; neither the government’s attempts
                                 to collect taxes or reduce spending were very successful, and the state debt therefore had ballooned.
                                 When, in addition, the prices of oil and other key Russian commodity exports were depressed by the
                                 crisis in Asia, investors began to fear in the spring of 1998 that the ruble, like many of the Asian
                                 currencies the year before, was in for a steep devaluation. Interest rates on government borrowing
                                 rose, inflating Russia’s fiscal deficit.
                                 Despite Russia’s failure to abide by earlier IMF stabilization programs, the Fund nonetheless entered
                                 into a new agreement with its government and provided billions to back up the ruble’s exchange
                                 rate. The IMF feared that a Russian collapse could lead to renewed turbulence in the developing
                                 world, as well as posing a nuclear threat if Russia decided to sell off its arsenal. In mid-August 1998,
                                 however, the Russian government abandoned its exchange rate target; at the same time as it devalued,
                                 it defaulted on its debts and froze international payments. The government resumed printing money
                                 to pay its bills and within a month the ruble had lost half its value. Despite Russia’s rather small
                                 direct relevance to the wealth of international investors, its actions set off panic in the world capital
                                 market as investors tried to increase their liquidity by selling emerging market securities. In response,
                                 the U.S. Federal Reserve lowered dollar interest rates sharply, possibly averting a worldwide financial
                                 collapse. Russia’s output recovered in 1999 and growth was rapid afterward, helped by higher world
                                 oil prices.
                                 26.2 Lessons of Developing Country Crises

                                 The emerging market crisis that started with Thailand’s 1997 devaluation produced what might be
                                 called an orgy of finger-pointing. Some Westerners blamed the crisis on the policies of the Asians
                                 themselves, especially the “crony capitalism” under which businesspeople and politicians had
                                 excessively cozy relationships. Some Asian leaders, in turn, blamed the crisis on the machinations of
                                 Western financiers; even Hong Kong, normally a bastion of free market sentiment, began intervening
                                 to block what it described as a conspiracy by speculators to drive down its stock market and undermine
                                 its currency. And almost everyone criticized the IMF, although some said it was wrong to tell countries
                                 to try to limit the depreciation of their currencies, others that it was wrong to allow the currencies to
                                 depreciate at all.
                                 Nonetheless some very clear lessons emerge from a careful study of the Asian crisis and earlier
                                 developing-country crises in Latin America and elsewhere.
                                 1.   Choosing the right exchange rate regime : It is perilous for a developing country to fix its
                                      exchange rate unless it has the means and commitment to do so, come what may. East Asian
                                      countries found that confidence in official exchange rate targets encouraged borrowing in foreign
                                      currencies. When devaluation occurred nonetheless, much of the financial sector and many
                                      corporations became insolvent as a result of extensive foreign-currency denominated debts.
                                      The developing countries that have successfully stabilized inflation have adopted more flexible



        288                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299