Page 275 - DECO504_STATISTICAL_METHODS_IN_ECONOMICS_ENGLISH
P. 275

Unit 21: Cost of Living Index and Its Uses and Limitations of Index Numbers


            Example 9:  (a)   From the chain base index numbers given below, prepare fixed base index  Notes
                                numbers:
                 Year:            2001        2002        2003        2004       2005

                 Index:            110         150        140         200         150
                        (b)  From the chain base index number given below, construct fixed base index
                               numbers:
                 Year:                   2001      2002      2003       2004      2005
                 Chain Base Indices:      80        110       120        90        140

            Solution:
                                CONSTRUCTION OF COST OF LIVING INDEX

                                                     p
                Expenses      2004       2005        1  × 100        W          PW
                                                     p 0
                               p          p
                                0          1
                Food          150         174         116            35         4060
                Rent           50         60          120            15         1800
                Clothing      100         125         125            20         2500
                Fuel           20         25          125            10         1250
                Misc           60         90          150            20         3000

                                                                 ∑W  = 100  ∑PW  = 12610

                                         ∑PW    12610
                        Cost of Living Index   =      = 126.1. Thus as compared to 2004 the cost of
                                         ∑W      100
                        living index has risen by 26.1 per cent in 2005.
            21.2 Limitations of Index Numbers


            Though the index numbers are of great significance, the reader must also be aware of their limitations
            so that he avoids errors of interpretation. The chief limitations of index numbers are:
            1.  Since index numbers are generally based on a sample, it is not possible to take into account
                each and every item in the construction of the index.
            2.  While taking the sample random sampling is seldom used. This is so because to sample from a
                population of literally millions of commodities and services, the random procedure could neither
                be practical nor representative. Typically, indices are constructed from samples deliberately
                selected. This is likely to introduce errors and every effort must be made to minimise these
                errors.
            3.  It is often difficult to take into account changes in the quality of products. With the passage of
                time tastes and habits of people also change with the result that very often old commodities go
                out of use and new commodities are introduced. In a really typical index, qualities of commodities
                should remain the same over a period of time because differences in quality would mean
                differences in prices also. But very often it is not practicable and it makes comparisons over
                long periods less reliable.
            4.  A large number of methods have been designed for constructing index numbers and different
                methods of computation give different results. Very often the selection of an appropriate formula
                creates problems and in the interest of comparability, it is necessary to ensure that the same




                                             LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                      269
   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280