Page 253 - DEDU503_EDUCATIONAL_MANAGEMENT_ENGLISH
P. 253

Unit 19: Planning and Organizing Supervisory Activity


               individual personalities and no attempt is made to utilise the intelligence and talent of the  Notes
               juniors. There is great wastage of both talent and energy. Activities are duplicated ; and due to
               lack of distribution of responsibility important activities and services quite often remain
               neglected. The greatest disadvantage of such an organization are two. Firstly, even a temporary
               withdrawal of the key person or head precipitates a crisis. “When the cat is away the mice will
               play.” Secondly, lack of inter-personal communication within the group reduces the morale of
               the workers.

               The authoritarian organization is still quite popular and is used widely in our country as well
               as in other countries of the world. Though, it is being gradually replaced by the leadership-
               oriented or democratic pattern of supervisory organization, it is hoped that it will be used for
               a long time to come. The leadership-oriented organization is based upon leadership instead of
               authority and is formulated co-operatively by all the concerned persons. Theoretically, it is no
               doubt superior to authoritarian organization of supervisory programmes. But, in practice it
               requires for being effective a high level of socialization and acculturation of people who have
               to operate it. Rorer has described two types of authoritarian organizations, internal, and external.
               The external organization deals with the machinery and personnel of a system. The internal
               organization deals with the functioning of the machinery.
               In case of the external organization the authority is centralized in the legally appointed person at
               the head. For example, the district inspector of schools in Uttar Pradesh is responsible for the
               general instructional policy of the department of education and the principal of a school is the
               executive-in-chief with supreme responsibility in his school. He is directly responsible to the
               district inspector of schools. The authority and responsibility may be delegated by the district
               inspector to inferior officers. In this case, the performance of duties at a particular level are
               checked by the next higher authority. The principal or a departmental head is both an
               administrative and a supervisory officer.
               In case of internal organization facility for co-operation and co-ordination is provided and there
               is a common policy, theory of education, technology, philosophy and aims for all. The next
               higher officer co-ordinates the work of officers and other persons. At the highest level there is
               the director of education who co-ordinates the functioning of the deputy directors. The deputy
               director co-ordinates the functioning of all the district inspectors of his region. Cases of conflict
               or disagreement between any officers or groups are settled by the next higher administrative
               officer and ultimately by the director of education. One preferable feature of this kind of
               organisation is that there is flexibility of operation in this. When the need arises adjustment of
               duties, transfer of work, assignment of additional duty is possible. These features counteract, in
               some measure, the inherently un-democratic nature of authoritarian organization.
               Authoritarian organizations are found, in the countries of the world, in different forms. One of
               these was named by Barr long ago. It is extrinsic-dualistic organization. In this case supervision
               was considered “extrinsic” to an educational organization. This consideration was responsible
               for dualistic conception of administration and supervision. As held by Barr extrinsic-dualistic
               organization has no central authority, no definition of lines, no mechanisms for co-operation,
               nor any modern method for co-operative formulation of procedures. The line and staff organization
               is another form which is found in its pure form in the army. In this kind of organization, line
               officers are those who are in authority and who issue orders. Authority descends along regularly
               defined” lines”from top officer to the lowest one. No officer at any point can be superseded
               when approaching the officer higher to him. Through “proper channel” procedures are strictly
               followed. Staff-officers are specialized experts belonging to professional and technical services.
               They have no authority and issue no orders though they may have equivalent ranks. Their
               duties are to supply information, give advice or technical assistance to the line-officers. This
               kind of organization due to the rigidity of its functioning is considered suitable for army,
               publishing companies, manufacturing concerns, etc., but not for the schools and other educational




                                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    247
   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258