Page 255 - DENG403_BRITISH_DRAMA
P. 255

Jayatee Bhattacharya, Lovely Professional University  Unit 20: The School for Scandal: Criticism to the Text and Characterization




                   Unit 20: The School for Scandal: Criticism to the                                 Notes

                                  Text and Characterization



               CONTENTS
               Objectives

               Introduction
                20.1  Criticism to the Text

                20.2  Criticism to the Characters
                     20.2.1  Major Characters

                     20.2.2 General Criticism of all the Minor Characters

                20.3  Summary
                20.4  Keywords

                20.5  Review Questions
                20.6  Further Readings


            Objectives

            After studying this unit, you will be able to:
              •  Illustrate the criticism of the text of the School for Scandal;
              •  Enumerate all the characters in the play;
              •  Discuss the criticism of each character.


            Introduction
            As conceived by Robin Phillips, The School for Scandal displays a harsh and glittering world of exquisite
            beauty and viciousness, where sentimental sobriety—when genuine—is the only refuge from the
            savagery that lies in wait for vitality and virtue. Phillips has read the play as a piece of serious social
            criticism, with decidedly mixed results: his version of this classic comedy of manners is thought-
            provoking, visually stunning, but finally a failure.
            The School for Scandal is a kind of dramatic harpsichord. It has surface vivacity rather than inner
            strength. It has elegance of style rather than profundity of substance. Thumped by realism’s heavy
            hand, it would jangle and go mute; stroked with exquisite artifice, it enchants and amuses.
            Reading a play requires an ability to visualize, and it is very difficult to manage this visualization
            without a careful scrutiny of the stage directions and some experience reading drama. This notion
            is especially true for Richard Brinsley Sheridan’s School for Scandal, which makes the reader wish for
            a fine production to view.
            The characters of the play have their own significance by their names. Sheridan makes one particular
            characteristic or weakness appear and plays on it. For instance, Joseph is totally exposed; there is no
            depth and roundness which provides humor. The humor is created by such characters because of
            their limitations suggested by their names.



                                             LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   249
   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260