Page 188 - DENG502_PROSE
P. 188

Prose


                    Notes          18.5 Summary

                                   •    One of the triumvirate of eminent romantic essayists – Lamb, De Quincy and Hazlitt –
                                        Hazlitt is the least mannered or rather eccentric. While in Lamb’s and De Quincy emotion
                                        and imagination relegated the fast and the analytical to the insignificant, Hazlitt’s is a futile
                                        blend of emotion and thought, passion and logic imagination and analysis, the real and the
                                        romantic. However, he is famous for the lucidity and brilliance, in both style and content, of
                                        his many essays. Fully endowed with the ability of soaring in an imaginative flight, as in his
                                        essays On the Picturesque and Ideal and On a Sundial, his dominating bias was however
                                        for a union of romantic temperament and classical vigour. The resulting essays, including
                                        Common Sense on Fashion,  On the want of Money and  On Nicknames have the fine-
                                        wrought grace of the golden mean. His prose displays the same discrimination between the
                                        vulgar and the otiose, for he had a Wordsworthian faith in the simple and the sincere.
                                   •    The Round Table, Table Talk and The Plain Speaker cover a variety of subjects ranging
                                        from art and philosophy to politics and prizefighting. These works helped to establish Hazlitt’s
                                        reputation as the most versatile critic of his day.  The Spirit of the Age, a work that is
                                        regarded as his critical masterpiece, contains valuable biographical sketches of these writers
                                        and of other contemporary intellectual leaders. William Hazlitt was not only acquainted
                                        with that point of view as it appeared in books, but had the advantage of knowing the
                                        authors personally, and hearing their informal discussions of of individual writers.Farther,
                                        Hazlitt lectured extensively on English drama: Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays, Lectures
                                        on the English Poets, Views of the English Stage, Essays on the English Comic Writers,
                                        and  Dramatic Literature of the Age of Elizabeth. With these works Hazlitt established
                                        himself as one of the foremost literary critics of the romantic period and as a master of the
                                        informal essay.
                                   •    The romantics are renowned for expatiating at length upon the relatively trivial, and Hazlitt
                                        is no exception. Hazlitt has the romanticism to turn the humble topic of nicknames into an
                                        elaborate and animated discussion. A Juliet may contend that ‘a rose called by any other
                                        name would smell as sweet’, but Hazlitt describes how nicknames alter our perception of a
                                        person. To use the analogy of reflection used by Addison, the same person appears distorted
                                        when seen through the medium of nicknames.
                                   •    Whether in his literary essays on in his essays about everyday life, Hazlitt amazes the reader
                                        with his logical rigour. He points out that the basis of nicknames is a perception of difference
                                        or distinction: ‘The only meaning of those vulgar nicknames… is that others differ from you
                                        in some respect or other’ (whether it be opinion, dress, clime or complexion).
                                   •    Ironically, those who give nicknames often forget that those who have been given such
                                        opprobrious names have the same right to confer equally repulsive nicknames on the same
                                        principle of difference. Further, nicknames, as he points out with admirable logic, are effective
                                        only because they do not require any material proof, any causal evidence. Finally nicknames
                                        are much more effective than direct charges simply because while direct charges can be
                                        refuted, ‘a nickname baffles reply by the very vagueness of the influences from it’. Hazlitt also
                                        answers the question as to whom or what kind of men uses nicknames. He feels that it is the
                                        hidden enemies, the cowards and the hypocrites who use nicknames.
                                   •    Hazlitt is the erudite among the romantic essayists, like Coleridge among the romantic poets.
                                        He uses ordinary proverbs – ‘Give a dog an ill name and hang him’ – as well as learned or
                                        foreign phrases, such as  causa causal causa causatic. But his greatest virtuosity lies in his
                                        idolizations of literary quotations from Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Cymbeline, Julius
                                        Caesar, as well as numerous others from Southey, Foxe, Male, Voltare & so on.




          182                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193