Page 271 - DENG502_PROSE
P. 271

Unit 24:  Harriet Martineau-On Women...


          she was supportive of their feminism. Although she was not very tolerant of or informed about  Notes
          sexuality and unorthodox relationships, she was very supportive of work, education, political
          rights, and personal dignity for women; and she went a long way in supporting all manner of
          their manifestations. She came to be able to do this by objectifying the actual women involved as
          she led their causes.
          In a leader in the London Daily News published June 28,1854, Harriet Martineau wrote that “the
          wife-beating which has excited so much attention for the last two or three years, and which we
          have endeavored to meet by express legislation, has revealed to alarmed thousands of us that the
          mistresses of tyrannical men have a great advantage over the wives in being able to free themselves
          from their tyrant when they please. They can tell the truth in court about the treatment they have
          undergone; for they have nothing to fear from the vindictiveness of the brute when he comes out
          of gaol again.” This observation came in response to a report of a parliamentary Commission on
          Divorce. A Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Act was to pass in 1857, and Martineau’s support of
          it in the newspaper and her expression of that support in terms of the easing of brutality against
          poor women are indications of her surprisingly foresighted feminist outlook. The new law only
          established a single court where there had previously been three different jurisdictions to handle
          divorce cases and did not actually give women much relief, but Martineau’s argument is immensely
          important as an early feminist framework for later criticism and campaigns. Long before the
          coining of the word “feminist” and thirty years before the beginning of an organized women’s
          rights campaign in England, Harriet Martineau was a wide-ranging, progressive, and thorough-
          going feminist in nearly every sense in which that word is used today. Embracing practically
          every cause clearly in favor of women’s advancement in her lifetime and taking up certain issues
          that were not sodefinitely identified as parts of the feminist fabric until the 1960s and 1970s,
          Martineau was a giant among early feminists. An overview of Martineau’s writings and the issues
          and campaigns she fought for with her pen gives a contemporary reader both a profile of the
          emergence of feminism in nineteenth-century England and America and a theoretical foundation
          for the feminist social philosophy still dominant today.  She was the first Englishwoman to make
          the analogy between the American woman’s lot and the slave’s.  Publishing that claim in Society
          in America in the context of a full analysis of the situation of American women, she and her book
          received far more attention, both positive and negative, for her abolitionist views than for her
          feminism. Yet the book included a very astute chapter entitled “The Political Non-Existence of
          Women,” in which she claimed that the democratic principle was violated by the denial of political
          participation to women. It was from women that she had learned much that she knew about the
          United States, and she gave credit to these women for their achievements and talents. At the same
          time she criticized the lack of authority and choice for American women and the resulting servitude
          for many of them.  Martineau’s position as a model for today’s feminists or as aninspiration for
          female achievers is important. Alice S. Rossi’s inclusion of Martineau’s chapter on women from
          Society in America in her selection of classic feminist statements, The Feminist Papers ( 1973), indicates
          the current value of Martineau’s thought. In presenting her chapter from Martineau, Rossi especially
          represents Martineau as a forerunner of the discipline of sociology.
          Others could make such a claim for her relation to economics, though Martineau was a popularizer
          in that field, not an original thinker. Although it would be much too extravagant to claim a
          significant place for her as a fiction writer—her didactic tales, children’s stories, and novel Deer
          brook having small current readership—it is, nevertheless, important to note that  she wrote a
          considerable amount of fiction. The most comprehensive “first” that Martineau accomplished as a
          woman was as a journalist, for besides earning her living from her early thirties by writing
          numerous popular books and many articles for major journals, she contributed, as mentioned,
          over 1,600 editorials to the London Daily News on an enormous range of political and social topics
          during the 1850s and 1860S.




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       265
   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276