Page 69 - DENG503_INDIAN_WRITINGS_IN_LITERATURE
P. 69

Unit 7:  Amitav Ghosh: Shadow Lines—Narrative Techniques


          “The Shadow Lines,” Ghosh’s second novel, was published in 1988, four years after the sectarian  Notes
          violence that shook New Delhi in the aftermath of the Prime minister, Indira Gandhi’s assassination.
          Written when the homes of the Sikhs were still smouldering, some of the most important questions
          the novel probes are the various faces of violence and the extent to which its fiery arms reach
          under the guise of fighting for freedom. Ghosh’s treatment of violence in Calcutta and in Dhaka
          is valid even today, more than ten years after its publication. What has happened recently in
          Kosovo and in East Timor show that answers still evade the questions which Ghosh poses about
          freedom, about the very real yet non-existing lines which divide nations, people, and families.
          Much has been written about Amitav Ghosh’s novels. “The Novels of Amitav Ghosh”, edited by
          R. K. Dhawan was published this year by Prestige Books, New Delhi. If I find it necessary to say
          something more about Ghosh’s writing it is because this novel moved me as none other did in the
          recent times.
          Before that stage arrives the reader is catapulted to different places and times at breath taking
          tempo. The past, present and future combine and melt together erasing any kind of line of
          demarcation. Such lines are present mainly in the shadows they cast.





                   The Shadow Lines is the story of the family and friends of the nameless narrator who for
                   all his anonymity comes across as if he is the person looking at you quietly from across
                   the table by the time the story telling is over and silence descends.


          There is no point of reference to hold on to. Thus the going away - the title of the first section of
          the novel - becomes coming home - the title of the second section. These two titles could easily
          have been exchanged. The narrator is very much like the chronicler Pimen in Pushkin’s drama
          Boris Godonow. But unlike Pushkin’s Pimen this one is not a passive witness to all that happens
          in his presence, and absence. The very soul of the happenings, he is the comma which separates
          yet connects the various clauses of life lived in Calcutta, London, Dhaka and elsewhere. The story
          starts about thirteen years before the birth of the narrator and ends on the night preceding his
          departure from London back to Delhi. He spends less than a year in London, researching for his
          doctorate work, but it is a London he knew very well even before he puts a step on its pavements.
          Two people have made London so very real to him - Tridib, the second son of his father’s aunt, his
          real mentor and inspirer, and Ila his beautiful cousin who has travelled all over the world but has
          seen little compared to what the narrator has seen through his mental eye. London is also a very
          real place because of Tridib’s and Ila’s friends - Mrs. Price, her daughter May, and son Nick. Like
          London comes alive due to the stories related by Ila and Tridib, Dhaka comes alive because of all
          the stories of her childhood told to him by his incomparable grandmother who was born there.
          The tragedy is that though the narrator spends almost a year in London and thus has ample
          opportunity to come to terms with its role in his life, it is Dhaka which he never visits that affects
          him most by the violent drama that takes place on its roads, taking Tridib away as one of its most
          unfortunate victims. Violence has many faces in this novel - it is as much present in the marriage
          of Ila to Nick doomed to failure even before the “yes” word was spoken, as it is present on the riot
          torn streets of Calcutta or Dhaka. But the speciality of this novel is that this violence is very subtle
          till almost the end. When violence is dealt with, the idea is not to describe it explicitly like a
          voyeur but to look at it to comprehend its total senselessness.
          Thus the way “violence” is brought into the picture extraordinarily sensitive: The narrator says,
          talking of the day riots tore Calcutta apart in 1964, “I opened my mouth to answer and found I had
          nothing to say. All I could have told them was of the sound of voices running past the walls of my



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                        63
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74